Indexed in Journament

revista verde de agroecologia e desenvolvimento sustentável

ISSN 1981-8203· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,781 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 15.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name revista verde de agroecologia e desenvolvimento sustentável
Abbreviated Name revista verde de agroecologia e desenvolvimento sustentável
ISSN 1981-8203
URL http://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/index

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 34.5
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 62.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for revista verde de agroecologia e desenvolvimento sustentável
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 34.5 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.2
Content Distribution 62.8 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2018
Estimation of generation and gravimetric composition of solid wastes at Federal University of Campina Grande, Pombal, Paraíba, Brazil
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 66-73
401 views Abstract
2013
pelaksanaan kunjungan rumah oleh guru bk/konselor di sma negeri kota padang
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. -
342 views DOI Abstract
2018
Calotropis procera (Ait.) Apocynaceae grown on organic substrates
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 260-264
331 views Abstract
2016
hubungan persepsi siswa tentang budaya sekolah dan motivasi belajar dengan penyesuaian diri siswa
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 142-149
317 views DOI Abstract
2015
Desenvolvimento de espécies de pimentas sobre efeito de doses urina de vaca
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 26-31
308 views Abstract
2016
perilaku sosial siswa di sekolah dan implikasinya terhadap pelayanan bimbingan dan konseling
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 128-133
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
self confidence siswa dalam menyelesaikan tugas dan implikasinya terhadap layanan bimbingan dan konseling
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 88-93
257 views DOI Abstract
2013
hubungan antara perlakuan orangtua dengan kemandirian siswa dalam belajar
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. -
256 views DOI Abstract
2016
pengembangan modul bimbingan dan konseling untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi interpersonal siswa
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 133-138
222 views DOI Abstract
2018
Estimation of generation and gravimetric composition of solid wastes at Federal University of Campina Grande, Pombal, Paraíba, Brazil
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 66-73
401 views Abstract
2018
Calotropis procera (Ait.) Apocynaceae grown on organic substrates
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 260-264
331 views Abstract
2016
perilaku sosial siswa di sekolah dan implikasinya terhadap pelayanan bimbingan dan konseling
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 128-133
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
pendapat siswa tentang upaya guru bimbingandan konseling dalam mengembangkan moral siswa
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 208-213
39 views DOI Abstract
2016
pelaksanaan layanan bimbingan kelompok untuk menyiapkan mental siswa menghadapi ujian nasional
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 67-74
145 views DOI Abstract
2016
self confidence siswa dalam menyelesaikan tugas dan implikasinya terhadap layanan bimbingan dan konseling
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 88-93
257 views DOI Abstract
2016
pengembangan modul bimbingan dan konseling untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi interpersonal siswa
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 133-138
222 views DOI Abstract
2016
hubungan persepsi siswa tentang budaya sekolah dan motivasi belajar dengan penyesuaian diri siswa
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 142-149
317 views DOI Abstract
2015
Desenvolvimento de espécies de pimentas sobre efeito de doses urina de vaca
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 26-31
308 views Abstract
2013
peran guru bk dan guru mata pelajaran dalam mencegah tawuran antar pelajar
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. -
92 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,781 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

34.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.