psicodebate | Journament

Journal Ranking

#146 / 33,900
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

psicodebate

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name psicodebate
Abbreviated Name psicodebate
ISSN 1515-2251
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2015
What to do with the results of psychological tests of Education students, in the area of Counseling?
Gallardo, Marhilde Sánchez de;Faría, Ligia Pirela de;
Vol. 7 , pp. 169-192
306 views Abstract
2009
rhizosphere ph and phosphatase activity in orthic allophanic soil under pinus radiata seedlings grown with broom and ryegrass
;Achmad A. Rivaie;Russ W. Tillman
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 38-52
221 views DOI Abstract
2012
enhancing the productivity of degraded land through soil and water conservation technique in carita research forest, west java
;Pratiwi Pratiwi;Budi Hadi Narendra
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 81-90
214 views DOI Abstract
2006
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased early growth of gaharu wood of aquilaria malaccencsis and a. crasna under greenhouse conditions
;Maman Turjaman;Erdy Santoso;Yana Sumarna
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 139-148
195 views DOI Abstract
2009
the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and slow release fertilizer on the growth of alstonia scholaris (l.) br. seedlings in the nursery
;Ragil S.B. Irianto
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 139-147
191 views DOI
2016
effect of gamma irradiation on seed germination, storage, and seedling growth of magnolia champaca l.
;Muhammad Zanzibar;Dede J. Sudrajat
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 95-106
183 views DOI Abstract
2006
energy conversion from woody biomass stuff: possible manufacture of briquetted charcoal from sawmill-generated sawdust
;Han Roliadi;Gustan Pari
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 93-103
181 views DOI Abstract
2005
anatomical changes of kekabu wood (bombax ceiba l.) due to mechanical densification
;Krisdianto Krisdianto;Jamal Balfas
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 27-36
179 views DOI Abstract
2011
potency of biocontrol agents isolated from compost and peat soil of tropical peat swamp forest in kalampangan zone, central kalimantan
;Yuliar Yuliar;Zaenal Abidin;Wibowo Mangunwardoyo
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 144-157
178 views DOI Abstract
2006
the effect of individual selection for genetic diversity of acacia mangium seedling seed orchard using aflp markers
;A. Y.P.B.C. Widyatmoko;S. Shiraishi;A. Nirsatmanto;H. Kawazaki
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 75-81
168 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.