Indexed in Journament

Journal of education and health promotion

ISSN 2277-9531· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #3,852 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 86.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Educ Health Promot
Abbreviated Name j educ health promot
ISSN 2277-9531
URL http://www.jehp.net

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of education and health promotion
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 72.2 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 3.6 7.8
Content Distribution 73.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
A modified student personalized learning approach to prompt academic acquisition in health sciences.
Vol. 8 , pp. 156
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Health information needs assessment among self-help groups and willingness for involvement in health promotion in a rural setting in Puducherry: A mixed-method study.
Vol. 8 , pp. 186
412 views DOI Abstract
2015
Investigating the relationship between the demographic variables associated with suicide in different seasons, among suicidal people in the Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abass, Iran.
Vol. 4 , pp. 3
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Educational system defects and observing professional behavior: A qualitative study.
Vol. 8 , pp. 162
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prioritizing the health education needs based on community participation: AHP method.
Vol. 8 , pp. 127
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of empathy and biopsychosocial approaches of medical faculty assistant doctors.
Vol. 8 , pp. 214
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postgraduate Research Mentorship Program: An approach to improve the quality of postgraduate research supervision and mentorship in Iranian students.
Vol. 8 , pp. 109
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing a community-based breast cancer risk prediction tool for resource-poor settings.
Vol. 8 , pp. 106
354 views DOI Abstract
2022
Using instant messaging applications to promote clinical teaching of medical students.
Vol. 11 , pp. 254
168 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying the effective factors on the transition to the third-generation university: A qualitative study.
Vol. 8 , pp. 235
132 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the educational services quality of health information technology students.
Vol. 8 , pp. 168
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
Health information needs assessment among self-help groups and willingness for involvement in health promotion in a rural setting in Puducherry: A mixed-method study.
Vol. 8 , pp. 186
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of empathy and biopsychosocial approaches of medical faculty assistant doctors.
Vol. 8 , pp. 214
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
A modified student personalized learning approach to prompt academic acquisition in health sciences.
Vol. 8 , pp. 156
457 views DOI Abstract
2019
Educational system defects and observing professional behavior: A qualitative study.
Vol. 8 , pp. 162
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integration of information and communication technology in nursing education in Southeast Asia: A systematic literature review.
Vol. 8 , pp. 141
351 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #3,852 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.