Journal of education and health promotion | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1511 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

Journal of education and health promotion

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name J Educ Health Promot
Abbreviated Name j educ health promot
ISSN 2277-9531
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.jehp.net
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
A modified student personalized learning approach to prompt academic acquisition in health sciences.
Raeisi, Elham;Aazami, Mathias Hossain;Solati, Kamal;Mohamadi, Omid;Ahmady, Soleiman;
Vol. 8 , pp. 156
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teachers' perceptions on student evaluation of teaching as a tool for faculty development and quality assurance in medical education.
Debroy, Asitava;Ingole, Abhishek;Mudey, Abhay;
Vol. 8 , pp. 218
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Knowledge, attitude, and perception on organ donation among undergraduate medical and nursing students at a tertiary care teaching hospital in the southern part of India: A cross-sectional study.
Vincent, Britzer Paul;Kumar, Gunjan;Parameswaran, Sreejith;Kar, Sitanshu Sekar;
Vol. 8 , pp. 161
379 views DOI Abstract
2015
Investigating the relationship between the demographic variables associated with suicide in different seasons, among suicidal people in the Shahid Mohammadi Hospital, Bandar Abass, Iran.
Haghighi, Hamid;Golmirzaee, Javad;Mohammadi, Koroush;Moradabadi, Ali Safari;Dadipoor, Sakineh;Hesam, Ali Akbar;
Vol. 4 , pp. 3
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health information needs assessment among self-help groups and willingness for involvement in health promotion in a rural setting in Puducherry: A mixed-method study.
Rajaa, Sathish;Priyan, Shanthosh;Lakshminarayanan, Subitha;Kumar, Ganesh;
Vol. 8 , pp. 186
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Educational system defects and observing professional behavior: A qualitative study.
Alipour, Fateme;Shahvari, Zahra;Asghari, Fariba;Samadi, Shahram;Amini, Homayoun;
Vol. 8 , pp. 162
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prioritizing the health education needs based on community participation: AHP method.
Hashemian, Masoumeh;Ghardashi, Fatemeh;Izadi, A R;Akbarzadeh, Roya;
Vol. 8 , pp. 127
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of empathy and biopsychosocial approaches of medical faculty assistant doctors.
Cicek, Ebru;Yilmaz, Ahmet;Aslanhan, Hamza;
Vol. 8 , pp. 214
327 views DOI Abstract
2019
Developing a community-based breast cancer risk prediction tool for resource-poor settings.
Pillai, Divya;Hossain, Shaikh Shah;Chattu, Vijay Kumar;
Vol. 8 , pp. 106
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postgraduate Research Mentorship Program: An approach to improve the quality of postgraduate research supervision and mentorship in Iranian students.
Kordestani Moghaddam, Azadeh;Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad;Azadbakht, Leila;
Vol. 8 , pp. 109
311 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
32
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.