Indexed in Journament

Applied clinical informatics

ISSN 1869-0327· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.7/100
Journament Score
#1,614
Journament Rank
14
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Appl Clin Inform
Abbreviated Name applied clinical informatics
ISSN 1869-0327
URL https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/journal/10.1055/s-00035026

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2017
Using telephony data to facilitate discovery of clinical workflows.
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 381-395
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Decision-Centered Design of Patient Information Visualizations to Support Chronic Pain Care.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 719-728
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integration of a Commercial Barcode-Assisted Medication Dispensing System in a Teaching Hospital.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 615-624
335 views DOI Abstract
2016
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
314 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a Training Program to Improve Organizational Capacity for Health Systems Analytics.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 634-642
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 707-718
295 views DOI Abstract
2017
2020
Application Programming Interfaces in Health Care: Findings from a Current-State Sociotechnical Assessment.
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 59-69
261 views DOI Abstract
2025
"Be Really Careful about That": Clinicians' Perceptions of an Intelligence Augmentation Tool for In-Hospital Deterioration Detection.
Vol. 16 , pp. 377-392
15 views DOI Abstract
2023
A Call to Support Informatics Curricula in US-Based Residency Education.
67 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application Programming Interfaces in Health Care: Findings from a Current-State Sociotechnical Assessment.
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 59-69
261 views DOI Abstract
2019
Formative Usability Testing Reduces Severe Blood Product Ordering Errors.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 981-990
194 views DOI Abstract
2019
Decision-Centered Design of Patient Information Visualizations to Support Chronic Pain Care.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 719-728
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 707-718
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integration of a Commercial Barcode-Assisted Medication Dispensing System in a Teaching Hospital.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 615-624
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a Training Program to Improve Organizational Capacity for Health Systems Analytics.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 634-642
310 views DOI Abstract
2017
43
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.