Indexed in Journament

Applied clinical informatics

ISSN 1869-0327· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,824 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 86.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Appl Clin Inform
Abbreviated Name applied clinical informatics
ISSN 1869-0327
URL https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/journal/10.1055/s-00035026

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Applied clinical informatics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 71.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2017
Using telephony data to facilitate discovery of clinical workflows.
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 381-395
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Decision-Centered Design of Patient Information Visualizations to Support Chronic Pain Care.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 719-728
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integration of a Commercial Barcode-Assisted Medication Dispensing System in a Teaching Hospital.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 615-624
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
333 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a Training Program to Improve Organizational Capacity for Health Systems Analytics.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 634-642
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 707-718
305 views DOI Abstract
2017
2020
Application Programming Interfaces in Health Care: Findings from a Current-State Sociotechnical Assessment.
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 59-69
273 views DOI Abstract
2025
"Be Really Careful about That": Clinicians' Perceptions of an Intelligence Augmentation Tool for In-Hospital Deterioration Detection.
Vol. 16 , pp. 377-392
36 views DOI Abstract
2023
A Call to Support Informatics Curricula in US-Based Residency Education.
83 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application Programming Interfaces in Health Care: Findings from a Current-State Sociotechnical Assessment.
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 59-69
273 views DOI Abstract
2019
Formative Usability Testing Reduces Severe Blood Product Ordering Errors.
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 981-990
216 views DOI Abstract
2019
Decision-Centered Design of Patient Information Visualizations to Support Chronic Pain Care.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 719-728
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Visualization of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Data for Older Adults Using Participatory Design.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 707-718
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integration of a Commercial Barcode-Assisted Medication Dispensing System in a Teaching Hospital.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 615-624
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of a Training Program to Improve Organizational Capacity for Health Systems Analytics.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 634-642
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
Journament Score
38.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,824 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.