environmental technology (united kingdom) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1030 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ يوم

environmental technology (united kingdom)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
scopus
الاسم المختصر environmental technology (united kingdom)
الاسم المختصر environmental technology (united kingdom)
ISSN
الهدف والنطاق
URL
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2019
Removal of diclofenac from a non-sterile aqueous system using Trametes versicolor with an emphasis on adsorption and biodegradation mechanisms
Stenholm Å.
Vol. 40 , pp. 2460-2472
319 views DOI
2019
Adsorption of leather dyes on activated carbon from leather shaving wastes: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics studies
Manera, C.
Vol. 40 , pp. 2756-2768
312 views DOI
2020
Steam Explosion in alkaline medium for gelatine extraction from chromium-tanned leather wastes: time reduction and process optimization
Scopel, B.S.
Vol. 41 , pp. 1857-1866
275 views DOI
2019
Hyperbranched poly(amidoamine)/TMC reverse osmosis membrane for oily saline water treatment
Pei, B.
Vol. 40 , pp. 2779-2788
232 views DOI
2020
Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing coagulation process of paper recycling wastewater using Ocimum basilicum
Mosaddeghi, M.
Vol. 41 , pp. 100-108
220 views DOI
2013
new species of egg parasites from the oil palm stick insect (eurycantha insularis) in papua new guinea (hymenoptera, chrysididae, phasmatodea, phasmatidae)
;Lynn Kimsey;Charles Dewhurst;Seno Nyaure
Vol. 30 , pp. 19-28
209 views DOI Abstract
2011
a new derived species group of aleiodes parasitoid wasps (hymenoptera, braconidae, rogadinae) from asia with descriptions of three new species
;Buntika Butcher;M. Alex Smith;Donald Quicke
Vol. 23 , pp. 35-42
201 views DOI Abstract
2018
corrigenda: north-western palaearctic species of pristiphora (hymenoptera, tenthredinidae). journal of hymenoptera research 59: 1–190. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.59.12656
;Marko Prous;Katja Kramp;Veli Vikberg;Andrew Liston
Vol. 63 , pp. 125-126
197 views DOI Abstract
2011
nematinae (tenthredinidae) of thailand, with notes on other southeastern asian nematines
;David Smith
Vol. 22 , pp. 1-27
191 views DOI Abstract
2017
archaeoteleia masner in the cretaceous and a new species of proteroscelio brues (hymenoptera, platygastroidea)
;Elijah J. Talamas;Norman F. Johnson;Matthew L. Buffington;Dong Ren
Vol. 56 , pp. 241-261
184 views DOI Abstract
View All 27 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.