hepatic medicine : evidence and research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4368 / 33,986
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

hepatic medicine : evidence and research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name hepatic medicine : evidence and research
Abbreviated Name hepatic medicine : evidence and research
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2007
removal of organic dyes from industrial wastewaters using uv/h2o2, uv/h2o2/fe (ii), uv/h2o2/fe (iii) processes
;Nezamaddin Daneshvar;Alireza Khataee;Mohammad Hossien Rasoulifard;Mirsaeed seyed Dorraji
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 34-42
290 views Abstract
2013
treatment of row leachate using catalytic wet oxidation processes in combination hydrogen peroxide, a case study of isfahan composting factory leachate
;Behrouz Karimi;Mohammad hassan Ehrampoush;Mehdi Mokhtari;Asghar Ebrahimi
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 110-116
272 views Abstract
2016
preparation of diethylenetriamine modified polyacrylonitrile nanofibers for cadmium ion adsorption
;Zahra Mokhtari- shorijeh;mehdi Rafizadeh;Mehrnoosh Mohammadi
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 12-19
258 views Abstract
2007
a quality-quantity simulation model for stream-aquifer interaction
;Hamidreza Safavi;Abbas Afshar;Abbas Ghaheri;Ahmad Abrishamchi;Masoud Tajrishi
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 2-14
257 views Abstract
2017
integrated use of n-alkanes and pah to evaluate the anthropogenic hydrocarbon sources and the toxicity assessment of surface sediments from the southwestern coasts of the caspian sea
;Golshan Shirneshan;Alireza Riyahi Bakhtiyari;Mahmoud Meamariani
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 74-86
245 views DOI Abstract
2016
Challenging hepatitis C-infected liver transplant patients
M, Oliver;C, Chiodo Ortiz;J, Ortiz;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1-8
225 views Abstract
2010
conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater resources in abhar river basin
;Saeid Alimohammadi;Hojjat Hosseinzadeh
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 75-87
216 views Abstract
2013
investigation of electrocoagulation process efficiency for color removal from polyacrylic textile industrial astewater
;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 40-48
214 views Abstract
2012
comparison of partial and complete nitrification in sbr system for use in side stream processes
;Ali Dehnoei;Hossein Ganjidoust;Bita Ayati;Giti Emtiazi
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 9-21
192 views Abstract
2015
heavy metals in salt and water samples from maharloo lake and their comparison with metal concentrations in samples from sirjan, lar, and firoozabad salt mines
;Farahnaz Sabet;Mojtaba Bandegani;Mehraban Sadeghi;Masoud Hatami Manesh;Mohsen Mirzaei;Arash Haghshenas
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 89-96
170 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.