Indexed in Journament

journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy

ISSN 0305-7453· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.0/100
Journament Score
#6,982
Journament Rank
48
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Abbreviated Name journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
ISSN 0305-7453
URL http://jac.oxfordjournals.org

Indexings

scopus ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2011
positive and negative emotional responses to workrelated trauma of intensive care nurses in private health care facilities
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
300 views DOI Abstract
2015
2016
Amikacin use and therapeutic drug monitoring in adults: do dose regimens and drug exposures affect either outcome or adverse events? A systematic review
Vol. 71 , No. 10 , pp. 2754-2759
286 views Abstract
1992
A comparative study of imipenem versus piperacillin plus gentamicin in the initial management of febrile neutropenic patients with haematological malignancies
Vol. 30 , No. 6 , pp. 843-854
285 views Abstract
2017
lived experience of patients on tuberculosis treatment in tshwane, gauteng province
Vol. 22 , pp. -
278 views DOI Abstract
2001
Comparative in vitro activity of ertapenem and 11 other antimicrobial agents against aerobic and anaerobic pathogens isolated from skin and soft tissue animal and human bite wound infections
Vol. 48 , No. 5 , pp. 641-651
271 views Abstract
2002
Resistance to macrolides in clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes due to ribosomal mutations
Vol. 49 , No. 6 , pp. 935-939
258 views Abstract
2021
Combination versus monotherapy as definitive treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study
Vol. 76 , No. 8 , pp. 2172-2181
115 views Abstract
2021
Effective antimicrobial combination in vivo treatment predicted with microcalorimetry screening
Vol. 76 , No. 4 , pp. 1001-1009
117 views Abstract
2021
Comment on: Efficacy of temocillin against MDR Enterobacterales: a retrospective cohort study
Vol. 76 , No. 7 , pp. 1949-1950
166 views Abstract
2018
Molecular epidemiology of NDM-1- and OXA-48-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in an Iranian hospital: clonal dissemination of ST11 and ST893
Vol. 73 , No. 6 , pp. 1517-1524
86 views Abstract
2018
MIC-based dose adjustment: facts and fables—authors’ response
Vol. 73 , No. 9 , pp. 2585-2586
82 views Abstract
2018
Performance of the EUCAST disc diffusion method and two MIC methods in detection of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility to meropenem: the NordicAST CPE study
Vol. 73 , No. 10 , pp. 2905-2905
185 views Abstract
2018
MIC-based dose adjustment: facts and fables
Vol. 73 , No. 3 , pp. 564-568
106 views Abstract
2017
Community carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli is associated with strains of low pathogenicity: a Swedish nationwide study
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 582-588
151 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.