Indexed in Journament

Journal of the International AIDS Society

ISSN 1758-2652· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #5,484 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 81.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Int AIDS Soc
Abbreviated Name j int aids soc
ISSN 1758-2652
URL http://www.jiasociety.org/index.php/jias

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of the International AIDS Society
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 63.0 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 72.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2020
Accelerating progress towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a narrative review
Vol. 23 , No. 8 , pp. -
501 views Abstract
2019
Randomized controlled trial of a positive affect intervention to reduce HIV viral load among sexual minority men who use methamphetamine.
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. e25436
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perspectives on HIV partner notification, partner HIV self-testing and partner home-based HIV testing by pregnant and postpartum women in antenatal settings: a qualitative analysis in Malawi and Zambia.
Vol. 22 Suppl 3 , pp. e25293
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
HIV prevention programme cascades: insights from HIV programme monitoring for female sex workers in Kenya.
Vol. 22 Suppl 4 , pp. e25311
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Economic cost analysis of door-to-door community-based distribution of HIV self-test kits in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe.
Vol. 22 Suppl 1 , pp. e25255
439 views DOI Abstract
2019
Point-of-care viral load monitoring: outcomes from a decentralized HIV programme in Malawi.
Vol. 22 , No. 8 , pp. e25387
432 views DOI Abstract
2016
From conflict to partnership: growing collaboration between police and NGOs in countries with concentrated epidemics among key populations.
Vol. 19 , No. 4 Suppl 3 , pp. 20939
424 views DOI Abstract
2010
Barriers to initiation of antiretroviral treatment in rural and urban areas of Zambia: a cross-sectional study of cost, stigma, and perceptions about ART.
Vol. 13 , pp. 8
410 views DOI Abstract
2017
Improving antiretroviral therapy adherence in resource-limited settings at scale: a discussion of interventions and recommendations.
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 21371
403 views DOI Abstract
2023
2020
A more responsive, multi-pronged strategy is needed to strengthen HIV healthcare for men who have sex with men in a decentralized health system: qualitative insights of a case study in the Kenyan coast.
Vol. 23 Suppl 6 , pp. e25597
312 views DOI Abstract
2020
Adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy among pregnant and postpartum women during the Option B+ era: 12-month cohort study in urban South Africa and rural Uganda
Vol. 23 , No. 8 , pp. -
222 views Abstract
2020
Accelerating progress towards the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: a narrative review
Vol. 23 , No. 8 , pp. -
501 views Abstract
2020
Lessons learned from HIV can inform our approach to COVID-19 stigma.
Vol. 23 , No. 5 , pp. e25504
224 views DOI
2020
Modelling impact and cost-effectiveness of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis in 13 low-resource countries.
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. e25451
338 views DOI Abstract
2020
Liver function test abnormalities in a longitudinal cohort of Thai individuals treated since acute HIV infection.
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. e25444
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perspectives on HIV partner notification, partner HIV self-testing and partner home-based HIV testing by pregnant and postpartum women in antenatal settings: a qualitative analysis in Malawi and Zambia.
Vol. 22 Suppl 3 , pp. e25293
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Socio-behavioural characteristics and HIV: findings from a graphical modelling analysis of 29 sub-Saharan African countries.
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. e25437
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Randomized controlled trial of a positive affect intervention to reduce HIV viral load among sexual minority men who use methamphetamine.
Vol. 22 , No. 12 , pp. e25436
456 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
41.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #5,484 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

63.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.