American journal of ophthalmology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1249 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

American journal of ophthalmology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Am J Ophthalmol
Abbreviated Name am j ophthalmol
ISSN 1879-1891
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-ophthalmology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (48 total)

2019
Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma and Their Sources of Variability
Nouri-Mahdavi, K.
Vol. 207 , pp. 18-36
533 views DOI
2011
The photoreceptor layer as a prognostic factor for visual acuity in the secondary epiretinal membrane after retinal detachment surgery: imaging analysis by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
Theodossiadis PG;Theodossiadis GP;Charonis A;Emfietzoglou I;Grigoropoulos VG;Liarakos VS;;
Vol. 151 , No. 6 , pp. -
510 views Abstract
2013
Tear meniscus evaluation by anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography
Fukuda R;Usui T;Miyai T;Yamagami S;Amano S;;
Vol. 155 , No. 4 , pp. -
486 views Abstract
2010
Inner segment/outer segment junction assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Inoue M;Morita S;Watanabe Y;Kaneko T;Yamane S;Kobayashi S;Arakawa A;Kadonosono K;;
Vol. 150 , No. 6 , pp. -
467 views Abstract
2008
Vision-related quality of life and visual function after retinal detachment surgery
Okamoto F;Okamoto Y;Hiraoka T;Oshika T;;
Vol. 146 , No. 1 , pp. -
459 views Abstract
2008
Vision-related quality of life and visual function following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Okamoto F;Okamoto Y;Fukuda S;Hiraoka T;Oshika T;;
Vol. 145 , No. 6 , pp. -
426 views Abstract
2010
Long-term temporal changes of macular thickness and visual outcome after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Kim J;Rhee KM;Woo SJ;Yu YS;Chung H;Park KH;;
Vol. 150 , No. 5 , pp. -
424 views Abstract
1981
Vitreous surgery for macular pucker
Michels RG;;
Vol. 92 , No. 5 , pp. -
423 views Abstract
2006
Prospective controlled study of vapor pressure tear osmolality and tear meniscus height in nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Stahl U;Francis IC;Stapleton F;;
Vol. 141 , No. 6 , pp. -
405 views Abstract
2012
Outcomes of 4-snip punctoplasty for severe punctal stenosis: measurement of tear meniscus height by optical coherence tomography
Kim SE;Lee SJ;Lee SY;Yoon JS;;
Vol. 153 , No. 4 , pp. -
389 views Abstract
View All 48 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.