Indexed in Journament

American journal of ophthalmology

ISSN 1879-1891· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #580 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
48 Articles
Scores higher than 98% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Am J Ophthalmol
Abbreviated Name am j ophthalmol
ISSN 1879-1891
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/american-journal-of-ophthalmology

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 79.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 12.9 4.2
Content Distribution 77.0 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (48)

2011
The photoreceptor layer as a prognostic factor for visual acuity in the secondary epiretinal membrane after retinal detachment surgery: imaging analysis by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
Theodossiadis PG;Theodossiadis GP;Charonis A;Emfietzoglou I;Grigoropoulos VG;Liarakos VS;;
Vol. 151 , No. 6 , pp. -
578 views Abstract
2019
Longitudinal Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Glaucoma and Their Sources of Variability
Nouri-Mahdavi, K.
Vol. 207 , pp. 18-36
568 views DOI
2013
Tear meniscus evaluation by anterior segment swept-source optical coherence tomography
Fukuda R;Usui T;Miyai T;Yamagami S;Amano S;;
Vol. 155 , No. 4 , pp. -
567 views Abstract
2010
Inner segment/outer segment junction assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Inoue M;Morita S;Watanabe Y;Kaneko T;Yamane S;Kobayashi S;Arakawa A;Kadonosono K;;
Vol. 150 , No. 6 , pp. -
542 views Abstract
2008
Vision-related quality of life and visual function after retinal detachment surgery
Okamoto F;Okamoto Y;Hiraoka T;Oshika T;;
Vol. 146 , No. 1 , pp. -
514 views Abstract
1981
Vitreous surgery for macular pucker
Michels RG;;
Vol. 92 , No. 5 , pp. -
485 views Abstract
2010
Long-term temporal changes of macular thickness and visual outcome after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane
Kim J;Rhee KM;Woo SJ;Yu YS;Chung H;Park KH;;
Vol. 150 , No. 5 , pp. -
484 views Abstract
2006
Prospective controlled study of vapor pressure tear osmolality and tear meniscus height in nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Stahl U;Francis IC;Stapleton F;;
Vol. 141 , No. 6 , pp. -
475 views Abstract
2008
Vision-related quality of life and visual function following vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
Okamoto F;Okamoto Y;Fukuda S;Hiraoka T;Oshika T;;
Vol. 145 , No. 6 , pp. -
473 views Abstract
2012
Outcomes of 4-snip punctoplasty for severe punctal stenosis: measurement of tear meniscus height by optical coherence tomography
Kim SE;Lee SJ;Lee SY;Yoon JS;;
Vol. 153 , No. 4 , pp. -
434 views Abstract
2020
Association of Cardiovascular Mortality and Deep Learning-Funduscopic Atherosclerosis Score derived from Retinal Fundus Images.
Chang, Jooyoung;Ko, Ahryung;Park, Sang Min;Choi, Seulggie;Kim, Kyuwoong;Kim, Sung Min;Yun, Jae Moon;Kang, Uk;Shin, Il Hyung;Shin, Joo Young;Ko, Taehoon;Lee, Jinho;Oh, Baek-Lok;Park, Ki Ho;
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
Morning myopic shift and glare in advanced Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.
Loreck, Niklas;Adler, Werner;Siebelmann, Sebastian;Rokohl, Alexander C;Heindl, Ludwig M;Cursiefen, Claus;Bachmann, Björn O;Matthaei, Mario;
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Near-Infrared Reflectance Imaging for Quantification of Atrophy associated with Age-related Macular Degeneration.
Abdelfattah, Nizar Saleh;Sadda, Jaya;Wang, Ziyuan;Hu, Zhihong;Sadda, Srinivas;
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
Visual Function and Disability are Associated with Increased Retinal Volumetric Vessel Density in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
Jiang, Hong;Gameiro, Giovana Rosa;Liu, Yi;Lin, Ying;Jeffrey, Hernandez;Deng, Yuqing;Gregori, Giovanni;Delgado, Silvia;Wang, Jianhua;
244 views DOI Abstract
2019
The value and caveats of interpreting small case series - implications for patient care.
Parrish, Richard K;Chang, Ta Chen;Duncan Powers, Sarah L;
259 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Glasses for Moderate Hyperopia in Children 3 to 5 Years of Age
Holmes, J.
Vol. 208 , pp. 145-159
217 views DOI
2019
Incision-Free Minimally Invasive Conjunctival Surgery (MICS) for Late-Onset Bleb Leaks After Trabeculectomy (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis)
Gupta, N.
Vol. 207 , pp. 333-342
232 views DOI
2019
Comparison of endothelial keratoplasty techniques in patients with prior glaucoma surgery - a case-matched study.
Lin, Shawn R;Prapaipanich, Pitchaya;Yu, Fei;Law, Simon K;Caprioli, Joseph;Aldave, Anthony J;Deng, Sophie X;
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Retinoblastoma Enucleation: A Population-Based Study, SEER 18 2000-2014
Rajeshuni, N.
Vol. 207 , pp. 215-223
285 views DOI
2019
Impact of slab selection on quantification of choriocapillaris flow deficits by optical coherence tomography angiography.
Byon, Iksoo;Nassisi, Marco;Borrelli, Enrico;Sadda, Srinivas R;
299 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #580 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

79.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.