biogeosciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6658 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

biogeosciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name biogeosciences
Abbreviated Name biogeosciences
ISSN 1726-4170
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2011
Responses of woody species to spatial and temporal ground water changes in coastal sand dune systems
Máguas, C.;Rascher, K. G.;Martins-Loução, A.;Carvalho, P.;Pinho, P.;Ramos, M.;Correia, O.;Werner, C.;
Vol. 8 , No. 12 , pp. 3823-3832
420 views Abstract
2008
Meeting the challenge of mapping peatlands with remotely sensed data
Krankina, O. N.;Pflugmacher, D.;Friedl, M.;Cohen, W. B.;Nelson, P.;Baccini, A.;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 1809-1820
377 views Abstract
2012
Exploring the "overflow tap" theory: linking forest soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis
Heinemeyer, A.;Wilkinson, M.;Vargas, R.;Subke, J.-A.;Casella, E.;Morison, J. I. L.;Ineson, P.;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 79-95
357 views Abstract
2018
Ecosystem fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in an old-growth forest: temporal dynamics and responses to diffuse radiation and heat waves
Rastogi, B.;Berkelhammer, M.;Wharton, S.;Whelan, M. E.;Meinzer, F. C.;Noone, D.;Still, C. J.;
Vol. 15 , pp. 7127-7139
340 views Abstract
2018
Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method
Erkkilä, K.-M.;Ojala, A.;Ojala, A.;Ojala, A.;Bastviken, D.;Biermann, T.;Heiskanen, J. J.;Lindroth, A.;Peltola, O.;Rantakari, M.;Rantakari, M.;Vesala, T.;Vesala, T.;Mammarella, I.;
Vol. 15 , pp. 429-445
337 views Abstract
2017
Evaluating the Community Land Model (CLM4.5) at a coniferous forest site in northwestern United States using flux and carbon-isotope measurements
Duarte, H.
Vol. 14 , pp. 4315-4340
332 views DOI
2017
Hydromorphological restoration stimulates river ecosystem metabolism
Kupilas, B.;Hering, D.;Lorenz, A. W.;Knuth, C.;Gücker, B.;
Vol. 14 , No. 7 , pp. 1989-2002
327 views Abstract
2014
Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database
Leeuwen, T. T. van;Werf, G. R. van der;Hoffmann, A. A.;Detmers, R. G.;Rücker, G.;French, N. H. F.;Archibald, S.;Jr., J. A. Carvalho;Cook, G. D.;Groot, W. J. de;Hély, C.;Kasischke, E. S.;Kloster, S.;McCarty, J. L.;Pettinari, M. L.;Savadogo, P.;Alvarado, E. C.;Boschetti, L.;Manuri, S.;Meyer, C. P.;Siegert, F.;Trollope, L. A.;Trollope, W. S. W.;
Vol. 11 , No. 24 , pp. 7305-7329
312 views Abstract
2017
Seasonal variability of the inorganic carbon system in a large coastal plain estuary
Joesoef, A.;Kirchman, D. L.;Sommerfield, C. K.;Cai, W.-J.;
Vol. 14 , pp. 4949-4963
311 views Abstract
2019
Reviews and syntheses: Agropedogenesis-Humankind as the sixth soil-forming factor and attractors of agricultural soil degradation
Kuzyakov, Y.
Vol. 16 , pp. 4783-4803
281 views DOI
View All 19 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.