Indexed in Journament

biogeosciences

ISSN 1726-4170· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #21,923 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 25.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name biogeosciences
Abbreviated Name biogeosciences
ISSN 1726-4170

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 52.5
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 73.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 52.5 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 73.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2011
Responses of woody species to spatial and temporal ground water changes in coastal sand dune systems
Máguas, C.;Rascher, K. G.;Martins-Loução, A.;Carvalho, P.;Pinho, P.;Ramos, M.;Correia, O.;Werner, C.;
Vol. 8 , No. 12 , pp. 3823-3832
471 views Abstract
2008
Meeting the challenge of mapping peatlands with remotely sensed data
Krankina, O. N.;Pflugmacher, D.;Friedl, M.;Cohen, W. B.;Nelson, P.;Baccini, A.;
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 1809-1820
408 views Abstract
2012
Exploring the "overflow tap" theory: linking forest soil CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis
Heinemeyer, A.;Wilkinson, M.;Vargas, R.;Subke, J.-A.;Casella, E.;Morison, J. I. L.;Ineson, P.;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 79-95
385 views Abstract
2018
Ecosystem fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in an old-growth forest: temporal dynamics and responses to diffuse radiation and heat waves
Rastogi, B.;Berkelhammer, M.;Wharton, S.;Whelan, M. E.;Meinzer, F. C.;Noone, D.;Still, C. J.;
Vol. 15 , pp. 7127-7139
360 views Abstract
2018
Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method
Erkkilä, K.-M.;Ojala, A.;Ojala, A.;Ojala, A.;Bastviken, D.;Biermann, T.;Heiskanen, J. J.;Lindroth, A.;Peltola, O.;Rantakari, M.;Rantakari, M.;Vesala, T.;Vesala, T.;Mammarella, I.;
Vol. 15 , pp. 429-445
357 views Abstract
2017
Hydromorphological restoration stimulates river ecosystem metabolism
Kupilas, B.;Hering, D.;Lorenz, A. W.;Knuth, C.;Gücker, B.;
Vol. 14 , No. 7 , pp. 1989-2002
355 views Abstract
2017
Evaluating the Community Land Model (CLM4.5) at a coniferous forest site in northwestern United States using flux and carbon-isotope measurements
Duarte, H.
Vol. 14 , pp. 4315-4340
353 views DOI
2017
Seasonal variability of the inorganic carbon system in a large coastal plain estuary
Joesoef, A.;Kirchman, D. L.;Sommerfield, C. K.;Cai, W.-J.;
Vol. 14 , pp. 4949-4963
339 views Abstract
2014
Biomass burning fuel consumption rates: a field measurement database
Leeuwen, T. T. van;Werf, G. R. van der;Hoffmann, A. A.;Detmers, R. G.;Rücker, G.;French, N. H. F.;Archibald, S.;Jr., J. A. Carvalho;Cook, G. D.;Groot, W. J. de;Hély, C.;Kasischke, E. S.;Kloster, S.;McCarty, J. L.;Pettinari, M. L.;Savadogo, P.;Alvarado, E. C.;Boschetti, L.;Manuri, S.;Meyer, C. P.;Siegert, F.;Trollope, L. A.;Trollope, W. S. W.;
Vol. 11 , No. 24 , pp. 7305-7329
333 views Abstract
2019
Reviews and syntheses: Agropedogenesis-Humankind as the sixth soil-forming factor and attractors of agricultural soil degradation
Kuzyakov, Y.
Vol. 16 , pp. 4783-4803
298 views DOI
2019
static optimisation of mechanical systems based on the method of extremal regulation
;Jaroslav
Vol. 103 , pp. 15-29
99 views DOI Abstract
2019
Reviews and syntheses: Agropedogenesis-Humankind as the sixth soil-forming factor and attractors of agricultural soil degradation
Kuzyakov, Y.
Vol. 16 , pp. 4783-4803
298 views DOI
2018
Ecosystem fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in an old-growth forest: temporal dynamics and responses to diffuse radiation and heat waves
Rastogi, B.;Berkelhammer, M.;Wharton, S.;Whelan, M. E.;Meinzer, F. C.;Noone, D.;Still, C. J.;
Vol. 15 , pp. 7127-7139
360 views Abstract
2018
Methane and carbon dioxide fluxes over a lake: comparison between eddy covariance, floating chambers and boundary layer method
Erkkilä, K.-M.;Ojala, A.;Ojala, A.;Ojala, A.;Bastviken, D.;Biermann, T.;Heiskanen, J. J.;Lindroth, A.;Peltola, O.;Rantakari, M.;Rantakari, M.;Vesala, T.;Vesala, T.;Mammarella, I.;
Vol. 15 , pp. 429-445
357 views Abstract
2017
a “just culture”? conflicts of interest in the investigation of aviation accidents
;Tomasz BALCERZAK
Vol. 94 , pp. 5-17
227 views DOI Abstract
2017
Hydromorphological restoration stimulates river ecosystem metabolism
Kupilas, B.;Hering, D.;Lorenz, A. W.;Knuth, C.;Gücker, B.;
Vol. 14 , No. 7 , pp. 1989-2002
355 views Abstract
2017
Evaluating the Community Land Model (CLM4.5) at a coniferous forest site in northwestern United States using flux and carbon-isotope measurements
Duarte, H.
Vol. 14 , pp. 4315-4340
353 views DOI
2017
Seasonal variability of the inorganic carbon system in a large coastal plain estuary
Joesoef, A.;Kirchman, D. L.;Sommerfield, C. K.;Cai, W.-J.;
Vol. 14 , pp. 4949-4963
339 views Abstract
2016
investigation of slide mechanism of tread during operation of railway wheel
;Igor VAKULENKO;Svetlana PROIDAK;Oleg PERKOV
Vol. 90 , pp. 185-193
261 views DOI Abstract
2014
proactive strategy maintenance
;Stanisław RADKOWSKI;Robert GUMIŃSKI
Vol. 82 , pp. 193-202
241 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #21,923 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.