science of the total environment | Journament

Journal Ranking

#267 / 33,811
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

science of the total environment

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name science of the total environment
Abbreviated Name science of the total environment
ISSN 0048-9697
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (379 total)

2019
Bioaccessibility of short chain chlorinated paraffins in meat and seafood
Cui L.
Vol. 668 , pp. 996-1003
658 views DOI
2015
changes in knowledge of cervical cancer following introduction of human papillomavirus vaccine among women at high risk for cervical cancer
;L. Stewart Massad;Charlesnika T. Evans;Kathleen M. Weber;Gypsyamber D'Souza;Nancy A. Hessol;Rodney L. Wright;Christine Colie;Howard D. Strickler;Tracey E. Wilson
Vol. 12 , No. C , pp. 37-40
647 views DOI Abstract
2019
Particulate air pollution and ischemic stroke hospitalization: How the associations vary by constituents in Shanghai, China
Wang, W.
Vol. 695 , pp. 0-0
602 views DOI
2016
Education, fish consumption, well water, chicken coops, and cooking fires: Using biogeochemistry and ethnography to study exposure of children from Yucatan, Mexico to metals and arsenic
Arcega-Cabrera F.
Vol. 568 , pp. 75-82
501 views DOI
2019
Innovation hotspots in food waste treatment, biogas, and anaerobic digestion technology: A natural language processing approach
De Clercq D.
Vol. 673 , pp. 402-413
479 views DOI
2019
Advanced oxidation process based on water radiolysis to degrade and mineralize diclofenac in aqueous solutions
Alkhuraiji T.
Vol. 688 , pp. 708-717
465 views DOI
2018
Cooking and co-ingested polyphenols reduce in vitro methylmercury bioaccessibility from fish and may alter exposure in humans
Girard C.
Vol. 616-617 , pp. 863-874
447 views DOI
2020
Microplastic (1 and 5 μm) exposure disturbs lifespan and intestine function in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Shang, X.
Vol. 705 , pp. 0-0
420 views DOI
2019
Combined magnetic, chemical and morphoscopic analyses on lichens from a complex anthropic context in Rome, Italy
Winkler, A.
Vol. 690 , pp. 1355-1368
420 views DOI
2019
Advanced redox zonation of the San Pedro Sula alluvial aquifer (Honduras) using data fusion and multivariate geostatistics
Di, Curzio D.
Vol. 695 , pp. 0-0
419 views DOI
View All 379 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.