applied clay science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1023 / 33,934
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 saat önce

applied clay science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indekslemeler
scopus ulakbim sci
Kisa Ad appl clay sci
Kisaltilmis Ad applied clay science
ISSN 0169-1317
Amac ve Kapsam
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/applied-clay-science
Yazar Talimatlari

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (128 total)

2019
A fast method for the chemical analysis of clays by total-reflection x-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (TXRF)
Allegretta, I.
Vol. 180 , pp. 0-0
445 views DOI
2017
efectos de un programa de ejercicio físico de 12 semanas en sujetos con revascularización coronaria o postangioplastia transluminal percutánea
;Mirary Mantilla-Morrón;Miguel Urina-Triana;Yaneth Herazo-Beltrán;Daniela Urina-Jassir
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 169-175
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Synthesis, characterization, thermal behavior and exchange reactions of new phases of layered double hydroxides with the chemical composition [M<sup>+2</sup><inf>6</inf>Al<inf>3</inf>(OH)<inf>18</inf>(SO<inf>4</inf>)<inf>2</inf>].(A(H<inf>2</inf>O)<inf>6</inf>).6H<inf>2</inf>O (M<sup>+2</sup> = Co, Ni; A = Li<sup>+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>)
Sotiles, A.
Vol. 181 , pp. 0-0
309 views DOI
2020
Sodium alginate oxide assembly layered double hydroxide and its structure-activity relationship to anti-fogging properties and flame retardancy of leather
Lyu, B.
Vol. 190 , pp. 0-0
287 views DOI
2019
Synthesis, characterization and electrochemical properties of composites synthesized from silver-tannic acid hybrid nanoparticles and different clays
Batista, F.
Vol. 181 , pp. 0-0
283 views DOI
anestesia cardiovascular ¿cardiología de salas de cirugía?: cardiovascular anesthesia. operating rooms cardiology?
;Juan C Giraldo
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 73-75
279 views
2019
The mixed impact of nanoclays on the apparent diffusion coefficient of additives in biodegradable polymers in contact with food
Lajarrige, A.
Vol. 180 , pp. 0-0
276 views DOI
2019
Large-scale orientated self-assembled halloysite nanotubes membrane with nanofluidic ion transport properties
Xu, P.
Vol. 180 , pp. 0-0
272 views DOI
2017
adherencia al tratamiento en la insuficiencia cardiaca y las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación
;Carolina Hernández-Pinzón;Magda L. Flórez-Flórez
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 96-104
266 views DOI Abstract
2012
riesgo coronario según ecuación de framingham en adultos con síndrome metabólico de la ciudad de soledad, atlántico. 2010 coronary risk according to framinghan equation in adults with metabolic syndrome in the city of soledad, atlantico, 2010
;Edgar Navarro;Rusvelt F Vargas
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 109-118
262 views Abstract
View All 128 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.