Indexed in Journament

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience

ISSN 1662-5145· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #10,612 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
7 Articles
Scores higher than 63.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Front Integr Neurosci
Abbreviated Name front integr neurosci
ISSN 1662-5145
URL http://www.frontiersin.org/integrative_neuroscience

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 66.7 28.8
Innovation 28.5 31.2
Community Impact 7.9 13.4
Content Distribution 76.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (7)

2010
adaptability and stability of vegetable common bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.) accessions from the vir collection in crimea
;Vishnyakova Margarita A.;Filimonova Yuliya A.
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 499-504
517 views Abstract
2015
Brain Computer Interface Learning for Systems Based on Electrocorticography and Intracortical Microelectrode Arrays
Hiremath, Shivayogi V;Hiremath, Shivayogi V;eChen, Weidong;eChen, Weidong;eWang, Wei;eWang, Wei;eWang, Wei;eWang, Wei;eFoldes, Stephen;eFoldes, Stephen;eFoldes, Stephen;eYang, Ying;eYang, Ying;Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Christine;Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Christine;Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Christine;Collinger, Jennifer L;Collinger, Jennifer L;Collinger, Jennifer L;Collinger, Jennifer L;Boninger, Michael L;Boninger, Michael L;Boninger, Michael L;Boninger, Michael L;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
371 views Abstract
2011
Auditory perception of self-similarity in water sounds.
Geffen, Maria Neimark;eGervain, Judit;Werker, Janet F;Magnasco, Marcelo O;
Vol. 5 , pp. -
360 views Abstract
2019
Can Brain Waves Really Tell If a Product Will Be Purchased? Inferring Consumer Preferences From Single-Item Brain Potentials.
Goto, Nobuhiko;Lim, Xue Li;Shee, Dexter;Hatano, Aya;Khong, Kok Wei;Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner;Watabe, Motoki;Schaefer, Alexandre;
Vol. 13 , pp. 19
340 views DOI Abstract
2015
Approaching motor and language deficits in autism from below: a biolinguistic perspective
eBenítez-Burraco, Antonio;eBoeckx, Cedric;eBoeckx, Cedric;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
293 views
2021
Weak Vestibular Response in Persistent Developmental Stuttering
Gattie, M.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
289 views DOI
2024
Intermittent hypoxic training - derived exosomes in stroke rehabilitation.
Ryou, Myoung-Gwi;Burton, Summer;
Vol. 18 , pp. 1475234
128 views DOI Abstract
2024
Intermittent hypoxic training - derived exosomes in stroke rehabilitation.
Ryou, Myoung-Gwi;Burton, Summer;
Vol. 18 , pp. 1475234
128 views DOI Abstract
2021
Weak Vestibular Response in Persistent Developmental Stuttering
Gattie, M.
Vol. 15 , pp. 0-0
289 views DOI
2019
Can Brain Waves Really Tell If a Product Will Be Purchased? Inferring Consumer Preferences From Single-Item Brain Potentials.
Goto, Nobuhiko;Lim, Xue Li;Shee, Dexter;Hatano, Aya;Khong, Kok Wei;Buratto, Luciano Grüdtner;Watabe, Motoki;Schaefer, Alexandre;
Vol. 13 , pp. 19
340 views DOI Abstract
2015
Approaching motor and language deficits in autism from below: a biolinguistic perspective
eBenítez-Burraco, Antonio;eBoeckx, Cedric;eBoeckx, Cedric;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
293 views
2015
Brain Computer Interface Learning for Systems Based on Electrocorticography and Intracortical Microelectrode Arrays
Hiremath, Shivayogi V;Hiremath, Shivayogi V;eChen, Weidong;eChen, Weidong;eWang, Wei;eWang, Wei;eWang, Wei;eWang, Wei;eFoldes, Stephen;eFoldes, Stephen;eFoldes, Stephen;eYang, Ying;eYang, Ying;Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Christine;Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Christine;Tyler-Kabara, Elizabeth Christine;Collinger, Jennifer L;Collinger, Jennifer L;Collinger, Jennifer L;Collinger, Jennifer L;Boninger, Michael L;Boninger, Michael L;Boninger, Michael L;Boninger, Michael L;
Vol. 9 , pp. -
371 views Abstract
2011
Auditory perception of self-similarity in water sounds.
Geffen, Maria Neimark;eGervain, Judit;Werker, Janet F;Magnasco, Marcelo O;
Vol. 5 , pp. -
360 views Abstract
2010
adaptability and stability of vegetable common bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.) accessions from the vir collection in crimea
;Vishnyakova Margarita A.;Filimonova Yuliya A.
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 499-504
517 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #10,612 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

28.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.