Preventive medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2015 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Preventive medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Prev Med
Abbreviated Name prev med
ISSN 1096-0260
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/preventive-medicine
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2003
The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results
Glasgow RE;Boles SM;McKay HG;Feil EG;Barrera M;;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. -
455 views Abstract
2019
The effects of student, school and neighborhood poverty on the association between fitness and absenteeism in New York City middle school youth.
D'Agostino, Emily M;Day, Sophia E;Konty, Kevin J;Larkin, Michael;Wyka, Katarzyna;
, pp. 105820
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
The mediating role of perceived crime in gender and built environment associations with park use and park-based physical activity among park users in high poverty neighborhoods.
Derose, Kathryn P;Han, Bing;Park, Sujeong;Williamson, Stephanie;Cohen, Deborah A;
, pp. 105846
424 views DOI Abstract
2012
Treated individuals who progress to action or maintenance for one behavior are more likely to make similar progress on another behavior: coaction results of a pooled data analysis of three trials
Paiva AL;Prochaska JO;Yin HQ;Rossi JS;Redding CA;Blissmer B;Robbins ML;Velicer WF;Lipschitz J;Amoyal N;Babbin SF;Blaney CL;Sillice MA;Fernandez A;McGee H;Horiuchi S;;
Vol. 54 , No. 5 , pp. -
422 views Abstract
2019
Women's obstetric and reproductive health care discourse in online forums: Perceived access and quality pre- and post-Affordable Care Act.
Williams, Serena A P;Dhillon, Soneet;
Vol. 124 , pp. 50-54
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Receipt of direct tobacco mail/email coupons and coupon redemption: Demographic and socioeconomic disparities among adult smokers in the United States
Osman, A.
Vol. 126 , pp. 0-0
376 views DOI
2019
Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.
Zahnd, Whitney E;McLafferty, Sara L;Eberth, Jan M;
, pp. 105835
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using susceptibility measures to prospectively predict ever use of electronic cigarettes among adolescents.
Seo, Dong-Chul;Kwon, Elizabeth;Lee, Shieun;Seo, JangDong;
Vol. 130 , pp. 105896
367 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gaps in provider lifestyle counseling and its adherence among obese adults with prediabetes and diabetes in the United States.
Valero-Elizondo, Javier;Aneni, Ehimen C;Osondu, Chukwuemeka U;Grandhi, Gowtham R;Virani, Salim S;Nasir, Khurram;
, pp. 105815
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sexual orientation inequalities during provider-patient interactions in provider encouragement of sexual and reproductive health care.
Solazzo, Alexa L;Tabaac, Ari R;Agénor, Madina;Austin, S Bryn;Charlton, Brittany M;
Vol. 126 , pp. 105787
362 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.