Indexed in Journament

Preventive medicine

ISSN 1096-0260· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,454 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 47.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Prev Med
Abbreviated Name prev med
ISSN 1096-0260
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/preventive-medicine

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Preventive medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 20.0 12.6
Diversity 5.6 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 12.1 9.7
Content Distribution 76.4 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2003
The D-Net diabetes self-management program: long-term implementation, outcomes, and generalization results
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. -
519 views Abstract
2019
2012
Treated individuals who progress to action or maintenance for one behavior are more likely to make similar progress on another behavior: coaction results of a pooled data analysis of three trials
Vol. 54 , No. 5 , pp. -
459 views Abstract
2019
The effects of student, school and neighborhood poverty on the association between fitness and absenteeism in New York City middle school youth.
, pp. 105820
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.
, pp. 105835
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using susceptibility measures to prospectively predict ever use of electronic cigarettes among adolescents.
Vol. 130 , pp. 105896
401 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gaps in provider lifestyle counseling and its adherence among obese adults with prediabetes and diabetes in the United States.
, pp. 105815
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sexual orientation inequalities during provider-patient interactions in provider encouragement of sexual and reproductive health care.
Vol. 126 , pp. 105787
388 views DOI Abstract
2023
A call to action: Contingency management to improve post-release treatment engagement among people with opioid use disorder who are incarcerated.
Vol. 176 , pp. 107647
141 views DOI Abstract
2021
Rural-urban differences in stroke risk
, pp. -
141 views Abstract
2020
Exposure to tobacco content in episodic programs and tobacco and E-cigarette initiation.
Vol. 139 , pp. 106169
183 views DOI Abstract
2020
A longitudinal study on the relationship between screen time and adolescent alcohol use: The mediating role of social norms.
, pp. 105992
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
'Home is where the health is': Housing quality and adult health outcomes in the survey of income and program participation.
, pp. 105990
365 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,454 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.