gates open research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#25 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
46.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
40
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

gates open research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name gates open res
Abbreviated Name gates open res
ISSN 2572-4754
Aim and Scope
URL https://gatesopenresearch.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2019
An illustration of how responsive feedback in a social marketing tobacco control intervention in Ghana enabled managers to make decisions that increased intervention effectiveness.
Agha, Sohail;Paullin, Jean;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1534
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implementing neuroimaging and eye tracking methods to assess neurocognitive development of young infants in low- and middle-income countries.
Katus, Laura;Hayes, Nathan J;Mason, Luke;Blasi, Anna;McCann, Samantha;Darboe, Momodou K;de Haan, Michelle;Moore, Sophie E;Lloyd-Fox, Sarah;Elwell, Clare E;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1113
401 views DOI Abstract
2018
Market penetration of Xpert MTB/RIF in high tuberculosis burden countries: A trend analysis from 2014 - 2016.
Cazabon, Danielle;Pande, Tripti;Kik, Sandra;Van Gemert, Wayne;Sohn, Hojoon;Denkinger, Claudia;Qin, Zhi Zhen;Waning, Brenda;Pai, Madhukar;
Vol. 2 , pp. 35
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
"What is the best method of family planning for me?": a text mining analysis of messages between users and agents of a digital health service in Kenya.
Green, Eric P;Whitcomb, Alexandra;Kahumbura, Cynthia;Rosen, Joseph G;Goyal, Siddhartha;Achieng, Daphine;Bellows, Ben;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1475
345 views DOI Abstract
2018
A demographic dividend of the FP2020 Initiative and the SDG reproductive health target: Case studies of India and Nigeria.
Li, Qingfeng;Rimon, Jose G;
Vol. 2 , pp. 11
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Using 'Theories of Change' and responsive feedback to design a digital service business for patent and proprietary medicine vendors in Nigeria.
Wright, Richard L;Gleek, Abi;Bergin, Nora;Williams, R Algy;Agha, Sohail;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1493
333 views DOI Abstract
2018
Improving energy efficiency of electrochemical blackwater disinfection through sequential reduction of suspended solids and chemical oxygen demand.
Hawkins, Brian T;Rogers, Tate W;Davey, Christopher J;Stoner, Mikayla H;McAdam, Ewan J;Stoner, Brian R;
Vol. 2 , pp. 50
318 views DOI Abstract
2018
Mobile money and branchless banking regulations affecting cash-in, cash-out networks in low- and middle-income countries.
Reynolds, Travis W;Klawitter, Marieka;Biscaye, Pierre E;Anderson, C Leigh;
Vol. 2 , pp. 64
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Understanding reproductive health challenges during a flood: insights from Belkuchi Upazila, Bangladesh.
Ray-Bennett, Nibedita S;Corsel, Denise M J;Goswami, Nimisha;Ghosh, Aditi;
Vol. 3 , pp. 788
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Planning and communicating prototype tests for the Nano Membrane Toilet: A critical review and proposed strategy.
Hennigs, Jan;Parker, Alison;Collins, Matt;Jiang, Ying;Kolios, Athanasios;McAdam, Ewan;Williams, Leon;Tyrrel, Sean;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1532
298 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
46
Overall
Below Average
30
50
30
40
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

46.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

40.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.