Pilot and feasibility studies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4253 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated il y a 2 semaines

Pilot and feasibility studies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexations
scopus ncbi doaj
Nom Abrégé Pilot Feasibility Stud
Nom Abrégé pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN 2055-5784
Objectifs et Portée
URL https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com
Instructions aux Auteurs

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
A step towards equitable clinical trial recruitment: a protocol for the development and preliminary testing of an online prostate cancer health information and clinical trial matching tool.
Borno, Hala T;Bakke, Brian M;Kaplan, Celia;Hebig-Prophet, Anke;Chao, Jessica;Kim, Yoon-Ji;Yeager, Jan;Cinar, Pelin;Small, Eric;Boscardin, Christy;Gonzales, Ralph;
Vol. 5 , pp. 123
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ambulatory Toxicity Management (AToM) Pilot: results of a pilot study of a pro-active, telephone-based intervention to improve toxicity management during chemotherapy for breast cancer
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.;MacKay, Cassandra;Han, Heekyung;Eberg, Maria;Gandhi, Sonal;Laferriere, Nicole B.;Powis, Melanie;Howell, Doris;Atzema, Clare L.;Chan, Kelvin K. W.;Kukreti, Vishal;Mitchell, Sandra;Nayer, Marla;Pasetka, Mark;Knittel-Keren, Dafna;Redwood, Erin;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
442 views Abstract
2019
Healthy Parent Carers peer-led group-based health promotion intervention for parent carers of disabled children: protocol for a feasibility study using a parallel group randomised controlled trial design.
Bjornstad, Gretchen;Wilkinson, Kath;Cuffe-Fuller, Beth;Fitzpatrick, Katharine;Borek, Aleksandra;Ukoumunne, Obioha C;Hawton, Annie;Tarrant, Mark;Berry, Vashti;Lloyd, Jenny;McDonald, Annabel;Fredlund, Mary;Rhodes, Shelley;Logan, Stuart;Morris, Christopher;
Vol. 5 , pp. 137
423 views DOI Abstract
2017
DIAMOND (DIgital Alcohol Management ON Demand): a mixed methods feasibility RCT and embedded process evaluation of a digital health intervention to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol use
Hamilton, Fiona L.;Hornby, Jo;Sheringham, Jessica;Linke, Stuart;Ashton, Charlotte;Moore, Kevin;Stevenson, Fiona;Murray, Elizabeth;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
395 views Abstract
2020
Active Women over 50 online information and support to promote physical activity behaviour change: study protocol for a pilot trial
Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
381 views DOI Abstract
2018
Trial of Remote Continuous versus Intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Downey, C L;Croft, J;Buckley, H;Randell, R;Brown, J M;Jayne, D G;
Vol. 4 , pp. 112
380 views DOI Abstract
2017
A study protocol of a three-group randomized feasibility trial of an online yoga intervention for mothers after stillbirth (The Mindful Health Study)
Huberty, Jennifer;Matthews, Jeni;Leiferman, Jenn;Cacciatore, Joanne;Gold, Katherine J.;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
365 views Abstract
2019
Teaching GenerationPMTO, an evidence-based parent intervention, in a university setting using a blended learning strategy.
Baumann, Ana A;Domenech Rodríguez, Melanie M;Wieling, Elizabeth;Parra-Cardona, J Rubén;Rains, Laura A;Forgatch, Marion S;
Vol. 5 , pp. 91
345 views DOI Abstract
2012
internet and citizenship in the suburbs of rio de janeiro
;Marco Schneider
Vol. 12 , pp. 279-292
320 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of clinical quality improvement interventions: feasibility of an integrated approach
Reddy, Sandeep;Namara, Kevin Mc;Malakellis, Mary;Denton, Tim;McDonald, Cathy;Opie, Jane;Sanigorski, Andrew;Versace, Vincent;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
280 views Abstract
View All 16 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.