Indexed in Journament

Pilot and feasibility studies

ISSN 2055-5784· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #571 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 98% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Pilot Feasibility Stud
Abbreviated Name pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN 2055-5784
URL https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 68.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 7.1 13.4
Content Distribution 68.3 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Ambulatory Toxicity Management (AToM) Pilot: results of a pilot study of a pro-active, telephone-based intervention to improve toxicity management during chemotherapy for breast cancer
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.;MacKay, Cassandra;Han, Heekyung;Eberg, Maria;Gandhi, Sonal;Laferriere, Nicole B.;Powis, Melanie;Howell, Doris;Atzema, Clare L.;Chan, Kelvin K. W.;Kukreti, Vishal;Mitchell, Sandra;Nayer, Marla;Pasetka, Mark;Knittel-Keren, Dafna;Redwood, Erin;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
488 views Abstract
2019
A step towards equitable clinical trial recruitment: a protocol for the development and preliminary testing of an online prostate cancer health information and clinical trial matching tool.
Borno, Hala T;Bakke, Brian M;Kaplan, Celia;Hebig-Prophet, Anke;Chao, Jessica;Kim, Yoon-Ji;Yeager, Jan;Cinar, Pelin;Small, Eric;Boscardin, Christy;Gonzales, Ralph;
Vol. 5 , pp. 123
486 views DOI Abstract
2019
Healthy Parent Carers peer-led group-based health promotion intervention for parent carers of disabled children: protocol for a feasibility study using a parallel group randomised controlled trial design.
Bjornstad, Gretchen;Wilkinson, Kath;Cuffe-Fuller, Beth;Fitzpatrick, Katharine;Borek, Aleksandra;Ukoumunne, Obioha C;Hawton, Annie;Tarrant, Mark;Berry, Vashti;Lloyd, Jenny;McDonald, Annabel;Fredlund, Mary;Rhodes, Shelley;Logan, Stuart;Morris, Christopher;
Vol. 5 , pp. 137
476 views DOI Abstract
2020
Active Women over 50 online information and support to promote physical activity behaviour change: study protocol for a pilot trial
Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
437 views DOI Abstract
2017
DIAMOND (DIgital Alcohol Management ON Demand): a mixed methods feasibility RCT and embedded process evaluation of a digital health intervention to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol use
Hamilton, Fiona L.;Hornby, Jo;Sheringham, Jessica;Linke, Stuart;Ashton, Charlotte;Moore, Kevin;Stevenson, Fiona;Murray, Elizabeth;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
436 views Abstract
2018
Trial of Remote Continuous versus Intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Downey, C L;Croft, J;Buckley, H;Randell, R;Brown, J M;Jayne, D G;
Vol. 4 , pp. 112
405 views DOI Abstract
2017
A study protocol of a three-group randomized feasibility trial of an online yoga intervention for mothers after stillbirth (The Mindful Health Study)
Huberty, Jennifer;Matthews, Jeni;Leiferman, Jenn;Cacciatore, Joanne;Gold, Katherine J.;
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
395 views Abstract
2019
Teaching GenerationPMTO, an evidence-based parent intervention, in a university setting using a blended learning strategy.
Baumann, Ana A;Domenech Rodríguez, Melanie M;Wieling, Elizabeth;Parra-Cardona, J Rubén;Rains, Laura A;Forgatch, Marion S;
Vol. 5 , pp. 91
377 views DOI Abstract
2012
internet and citizenship in the suburbs of rio de janeiro
;Marco Schneider
Vol. 12 , pp. 279-292
353 views Abstract
2019
Evaluation of clinical quality improvement interventions: feasibility of an integrated approach
Reddy, Sandeep;Namara, Kevin Mc;Malakellis, Mary;Denton, Tim;McDonald, Cathy;Opie, Jane;Sanigorski, Andrew;Versace, Vincent;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
320 views Abstract
2025
A coadapted community-based participatory group programme for parents/carers of children with complex neurodisability (Encompass-2): a pilot and feasibility study protocol.
Prest, Kirsten; Harden, Angela; Barnicot, Kirsten; Heys, Michelle
Vol. 11 , pp. 59
136 views DOI Abstract
2024
The feasibility and acceptability of a rewards system based on food purchasing behaviour in secondary school cashless canteens: the Eat4Treats (E4T) cluster feasibility, non-randomised, controlled intervention study
Moore, S.E.
Vol. 10 , pp. 0-0
75 views DOI
2020
The impact of summer programming on the obesogenic behaviors of children: behavioral outcomes from a quasi-experimental pilot trial.
Dugger, R;Brazendale, K;Hunt, E T;Moore, J B;Turner-McGrievy, G;Vogler, K;Beets, M W;Armstrong, B;Weaver, R G;
Vol. 6 , pp. 78
97 views DOI Abstract
2020
Active Women over 50 online information and support to promote physical activity behaviour change: study protocol for a pilot trial
Geraldine Wallbank,Catherine Sherrington,Leanne Hassett,Dominika Kwasnicka,Josephine Y. Chau,Fiona Martin,Philayrath Phongsavan,Anne Grunseit,Colleen Canning,Marian Baird,Roberta Shepherd,Anne Tiedemann;Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
302 views DOI Abstract
2020
Active Women over 50 online information and support to promote physical activity behaviour change: study protocol for a pilot trial
Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;Geraldine Wallbank;Catherine Sherrington;Leanne Hassett;Dominika Kwasnicka;Josephine Y. Chau;Fiona Martin;Philayrath Phongsavan;Anne Grunseit;Colleen Canning;Marian Baird;Roberta Shepherd;Anne Tiedemann;
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 1-13
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ambulatory Toxicity Management (AToM) Pilot: results of a pilot study of a pro-active, telephone-based intervention to improve toxicity management during chemotherapy for breast cancer
Krzyzanowska, Monika K.;MacKay, Cassandra;Han, Heekyung;Eberg, Maria;Gandhi, Sonal;Laferriere, Nicole B.;Powis, Melanie;Howell, Doris;Atzema, Clare L.;Chan, Kelvin K. W.;Kukreti, Vishal;Mitchell, Sandra;Nayer, Marla;Pasetka, Mark;Knittel-Keren, Dafna;Redwood, Erin;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
488 views Abstract
2019
Healthy Parent Carers peer-led group-based health promotion intervention for parent carers of disabled children: protocol for a feasibility study using a parallel group randomised controlled trial design.
Bjornstad, Gretchen;Wilkinson, Kath;Cuffe-Fuller, Beth;Fitzpatrick, Katharine;Borek, Aleksandra;Ukoumunne, Obioha C;Hawton, Annie;Tarrant, Mark;Berry, Vashti;Lloyd, Jenny;McDonald, Annabel;Fredlund, Mary;Rhodes, Shelley;Logan, Stuart;Morris, Christopher;
Vol. 5 , pp. 137
476 views DOI Abstract
2019
A step towards equitable clinical trial recruitment: a protocol for the development and preliminary testing of an online prostate cancer health information and clinical trial matching tool.
Borno, Hala T;Bakke, Brian M;Kaplan, Celia;Hebig-Prophet, Anke;Chao, Jessica;Kim, Yoon-Ji;Yeager, Jan;Cinar, Pelin;Small, Eric;Boscardin, Christy;Gonzales, Ralph;
Vol. 5 , pp. 123
486 views DOI Abstract
2019
Teaching GenerationPMTO, an evidence-based parent intervention, in a university setting using a blended learning strategy.
Baumann, Ana A;Domenech Rodríguez, Melanie M;Wieling, Elizabeth;Parra-Cardona, J Rubén;Rains, Laura A;Forgatch, Marion S;
Vol. 5 , pp. 91
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of clinical quality improvement interventions: feasibility of an integrated approach
Reddy, Sandeep;Namara, Kevin Mc;Malakellis, Mary;Denton, Tim;McDonald, Cathy;Opie, Jane;Sanigorski, Andrew;Versace, Vincent;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-9
320 views Abstract
Journament Score
43.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #571 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.