biological conservation | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1040 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

biological conservation

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name biol conserv
Abbreviated Name biological conservation
ISSN 0006-3207
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/biological-conservation
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, transparency, and trust in citizen science
Anhalt-Depies, C.
Vol. 238 , pp. 0-0
350 views DOI
1970
Methods for assessment of fish production in fresh waters. edited by W. E. Ricker. Published for the International Biological Programme as IBP Handbook No. 3. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford & Edinburgh: xiii + 313 pp., 7 plates, 47 figures, 21 × 15 cm, paper covers, 37s. 6d., 1968
Mann, R.
Vol. 2 , pp. 157-158
301 views DOI
2019
Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Harper, L.
Vol. 238 , pp. 0-0
300 views DOI
2015
Chytrid fungus infections in laboratory and introduced populations: assessing the risks for U.K. native amphibians.
Tinsley, Richard C;Coxhead, Peter G;Stott, Lucy C;Tinsley, Matthew C;Piccinni, Maya Z;Guille, Matthew J;
Vol. 184 , pp. 380-388
300 views Abstract
2019
Pathways to strategic communication for biodiversity conservation: Response to “Hearing ourselves (and acting in consequence): A commentary on Bekessy et al. from a bird-handling environmental education perspective”
Kusmanoff, A.
Vol. 233 , pp. 330-331
294 views DOI
2019
An evaluation of nest predator impacts and the efficacy of plastic meshing on marine turtle nests on the western Cape York Peninsula, Australia
Nordberg, E.
Vol. 238 , pp. 0-0
288 views DOI
2019
Prioritize diversity or declining species? Trade-offs and synergies in spatial planning for the conservation of migratory birds in the face of land cover change
Wilson, S.
Vol. 239 , pp. 0-0
265 views DOI
2020
Higher fish biomass inside than outside marine protected areas despite typhoon impacts in a complex reefscape
McClure, E.
Vol. 241 , pp. 0-0
263 views DOI
2018
Intensity-dependent impact of sport climbing on vascular plants and land snails on limestone cliffs
Schmera, D.
Vol. 224 , pp. 63-70
255 views DOI
2020
Patterns of species richness and endemism of butterflies and day-flying moths in the monsoon tropics of northern Australia
Braby, M.
Vol. 241 , pp. 0-0
231 views DOI
View All 13 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.