Indexed in Journament

Wellcome open research

ISSN 2398-502X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,096 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
14 Articles
Scores higher than 92.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Wellcome Open Res
Abbreviated Name wellcome open res
ISSN 2398-502X
URL https://wellcomeopenresearch.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Wellcome open research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 83.3 25.8
Innovation 61.5 27.4
Community Impact 13.6 7.8
Content Distribution 61.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
"If you catch my drift...": ability to infer implied meaning is distinct from vocabulary and grammar skills.
Vol. 4 , pp. 68
468 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multilingualism and strategic planning for HIV/AIDS-related health care and communication.
Vol. 4 , pp. 200
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recalibrating the 'world map' of palliative care development.
Vol. 4 , pp. 77
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
ActEarly: a City Collaboratory approach to early promotion of good health and wellbeing.
Vol. 4 , pp. 156
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Case Report: Three's a crowd: a case report examining the diagnostic and pharmacokinetic challenges in HIV-tuberculous meningitis-malaria co-infection [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
Vol. 3 , pp. -
403 views Abstract
2018
Mainstreaming as rhetoric or reality? Gender and global health at the World Bank.
Vol. 3 , pp. 18
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accounting for aetiology: can regional surveillance data alongside host biomarker-guided antibiotic therapy improve treatment of febrile illness in remote settings?
Vol. 4 , pp. 1
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
A realist review of community engagement with health research.
Vol. 4 , pp. 87
333 views DOI Abstract
2018
per un profilo di giovanni mestica
, No. 22 , pp. 14-19
218 views DOI Abstract
2018
la storia del romanzo italiano di gino tellini
, No. 22 , pp. 1-5
207 views DOI
2022
Sociodemographic characteristics of community eye screening participants: protocol for cross-sectional equity analyses in Botswana, Kenya, and Nepal.
Vol. 7 , pp. 144
145 views DOI Abstract
2020
PyOmeroUpload: A Python toolkit for uploading images and metadata to OMERO [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
Vol. 5 , pp. -
94 views Abstract
2019
Case Report: Three's a crowd: a case report examining the diagnostic and pharmacokinetic challenges in HIV-tuberculous meningitis-malaria co-infection [version 2; referees: 2 approved]
Vol. 3 , pp. -
403 views Abstract
2019
Multilingualism and strategic planning for HIV/AIDS-related health care and communication.
Vol. 4 , pp. 200
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
ActEarly: a City Collaboratory approach to early promotion of good health and wellbeing.
Vol. 4 , pp. 156
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
"If you catch my drift...": ability to infer implied meaning is distinct from vocabulary and grammar skills.
Vol. 4 , pp. 68
468 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recalibrating the 'world map' of palliative care development.
Vol. 4 , pp. 77
408 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accounting for aetiology: can regional surveillance data alongside host biomarker-guided antibiotic therapy improve treatment of febrile illness in remote settings?
Vol. 4 , pp. 1
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
A realist review of community engagement with health research.
Vol. 4 , pp. 87
333 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,096 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

83.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.