Indexed in Journament

journal of the royal army medical corps

ISSN 2052-0468· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #494 of 33,995 indexed journals
8 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name j r army med corps
Abbreviated Name journal of the royal army medical corps
ISSN 2052-0468
URL http://www.ramcjournal.com/index.html

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2019
Foreward to the special issue of the Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps on military psychology from the Surgeon General
Bricknell, M.
Vol. 165 , pp. 65
346 views DOI
2019
Concept of error and nature of nursing error detectors in military hospitals: a qualitative content analysis.
Ajri-Khameslou, Mehdi;Aliyari, Sh;Pishgooie, A H;Jafari-Golestan, N;Farokhnezhad Afshar, P;
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
For debate: health service support planning for large-scale defensive land operations (part 1).
Bricknell, Martin;Finn, A;Palmer, J;
Vol. 165 , No. 3 , pp. 173-175
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is the four quadrant approach to military medical ethics a cargo cult? A call for more unity between philosophers and practitioners
Jenkins, S.
Vol. 165 , pp. 270-272
321 views DOI
2019
Medical immunity, international law and just war theory
Allhoff, F.
Vol. 165 , pp. 256-265
304 views DOI
2014
Firebase medicine: extending the Role I aid station.
Wilson, Ramey L;Truesdell, A G;
Vol. 160 , No. 3 , pp. 207-10
291 views DOI Abstract
2018
Fentanyl lozenge story part 2: From military procurement to package
Rogers, E.
Vol. 164 , pp. 458-462
278 views DOI
2019
Are battlefield and prehospital trauma scenarios an effective educational tool to teach leadership and crisis resource management skills to undergraduate medical students?
Ellington, M.
, pp. 0-0
236 views DOI
2019
Are battlefield and prehospital trauma scenarios an effective educational tool to teach leadership and crisis resource management skills to undergraduate medical students?
Ellington, M.
, pp. 0-0
236 views DOI
2019
Concept of error and nature of nursing error detectors in military hospitals: a qualitative content analysis.
Ajri-Khameslou, Mehdi;Aliyari, Sh;Pishgooie, A H;Jafari-Golestan, N;Farokhnezhad Afshar, P;
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
For debate: health service support planning for large-scale defensive land operations (part 1).
Bricknell, Martin;Finn, A;Palmer, J;
Vol. 165 , No. 3 , pp. 173-175
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is the four quadrant approach to military medical ethics a cargo cult? A call for more unity between philosophers and practitioners
Jenkins, S.
Vol. 165 , pp. 270-272
321 views DOI
2019
Foreward to the special issue of the Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps on military psychology from the Surgeon General
Bricknell, M.
Vol. 165 , pp. 65
346 views DOI
2019
Medical immunity, international law and just war theory
Allhoff, F.
Vol. 165 , pp. 256-265
304 views DOI
2018
Fentanyl lozenge story part 2: From military procurement to package
Rogers, E.
Vol. 164 , pp. 458-462
278 views DOI
2014
Firebase medicine: extending the Role I aid station.
Wilson, Ramey L;Truesdell, A G;
Vol. 160 , No. 3 , pp. 207-10
291 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #494 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.