International journal of law and psychiatry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4444 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

International journal of law and psychiatry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name Int J Law Psychiatry
Abbreviated Name international journal of law and psychiatry
ISSN 1873-6386
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-law-and-psychiatry
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2019
The lived experience of community treatment orders (CTOs) from three perspectives: A constant comparative analysis of the results of three systematic reviews of published qualitative research
Corring, D.
Vol. 66 , pp. 0-0
329 views DOI
Psychopathic traits and maltreatment: Relations with aggression and mental health problems in detained boys.
Vahl, Pauline;Colins, Olivier F;Lodewijks, Henny P B;Lindauer, Ramon;Markus, Monica T;Doreleijers, Theo A H;Vermeiren, Robert R;
Vol. 46 , pp. 129-36
321 views DOI Abstract
Preventing sexual violence: can examination of offense location inform sex crime policy?
Colombino, Nicole;Mercado, Cynthia Calkins;Levenson, Jill;Jeglic, Elizabeth;
Vol. 34 , No. 3 , pp. 160-7
311 views DOI Abstract
2018
Prevention of medical errors and malpractice: Is creating resilience in physicians part of the answer?
Parks-Savage, A.
Vol. 60 , pp. 35-39
308 views DOI
2018
management of infected brachial-axillary prosthesis for hemodialysis: report of three cases
;Hamid Jiber;Abdellatif Bouarhroum
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 107-110
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Older adult mental health law special issue, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Williams, J.
Vol. 66 , pp. 0-0
269 views DOI
2016
a large vascular leiomyoma in femoral triangle
;Bhavinder Arora
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 101-103
244 views DOI Abstract
2017
antithrombotics: do we know enough?
;Edwin Stephen
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 84-84
216 views DOI
2018
intimal sarcoma of the popliteal artery presenting as popliteal artery aneurysm: a rare case report
;Mukesh Kumar Garg;Ambarish Satwik;Ajay Yadav;Sandeep Agarwal;Varinder S Bedi
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 111-114
198 views DOI Abstract
2016
fibromuscular dysplasia: a case study from china
;Shibchurn Mithilesh
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 73-74
177 views DOI Abstract
View All 17 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.