jurnal farmasi galenika (galenika journal of pharmacy) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#434 / 33,900
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

jurnal farmasi galenika (galenika journal of pharmacy)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name jurnal farmasi galenika (galenika journal of pharmacy)
Abbreviated Name jurnal farmasi galenika (galenika journal of pharmacy)
ISSN 2442-8744
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2016
wound healing properties of ethyl acetate fraction of moringa oleifera in normal human dermal fibroblasts
;Sivapragasam Gothai;Palanisamy Arulselvan;Woan Sean Tan;Sharida Fakurazi
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
551 views DOI Abstract
2013
ethnoveterinary practices and potential herbal materials for the treatment of ticks in north gondar
;Achenef Melaku
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 85-90
515 views DOI Abstract
2017
ethnopharmacological survey of medicinal plants with hallucinogenic effect and plants used against pain, inflammatory diseases, diabetes and urinary lithiasis in zagora “morocco”.
;Hicham Boufous;Fatimazahra Marhoume;Abderrahman Chait;Abdellah Bagri
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 342-350
480 views DOI Abstract
2013
effects of long-term use of polyphenols on the absorption and tissue distribution of orally administered metformin and atenolol in rats
;Saad Abdulrahman Hussain;Ausama Ayoob Jaccob
Vol. 2 , No. 3 , pp. 147-154
460 views DOI Abstract
2014
phytochemical and antimicrobial properties of chrysophyllum albidum, dacryodes edulis, garcinia kola chloroform and ethanolic root extracts
;MacDonald Idu;Nosa O. Obayagbona;Emmanuel O. Oshomoh;Joseph O. Erhabor
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 15-20
430 views DOI Abstract
2015
analgesic and free radical scavenging activities of hydromethanolic extract of crateva adansonii stem bark
;Nkeiruka E. Udeh;Samuel O. Onoja
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 224-227
425 views DOI Abstract
2013
antifungal activities of terminalia ivorensis a. chev. bark extracts against candida albicans and aspergillus fumigatus.
;Ouattara Sitapha;KPOROU KOUASSI ELISEE;Djaman Allico Joseph
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 49-52
408 views DOI Abstract
2016
nigerian propolis improves blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (hba1c), vldl and hdl levels in rat models of diabetes
;Ibrahim Oladayo Mustafa
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 233-238
372 views DOI Abstract
2013
effect of co-administration of allium sativum extract and metformin on blood glucose of streptozotocin induced diabetic rats
;Poonam Tripathi;Prem Prakash Gupta;Vijay Kumar Lal
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 81-84
364 views DOI Abstract
2017
geraniol attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced liver fatty acid alterations in male rats
;Ahmet Ozkaya;Zafer Sahin;Ahmet Orhan Gorgulu;Abdurrauf Yuce;Sait Celik
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 29-35
361 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.