The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3957 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Malays J Med Sci
Abbreviated Name malays j med sci
ISSN 1394-195X
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.mjms.usm.my/index.html
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (8 total)

2019
Assessing the Effectiveness of a Mental Health Literacy Programme for Refugee Teachers in Malaysia.
Tay, Kok Wai;Ong, Anna Wen Huey;Pheh, Kai Shuen;Low, Sew Kim;Tan, Chee Seng;Low, Poi Kee;
Vol. 26 , No. 6 , pp. 120-126
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Proposed Future Infrastructure Model for Basic Occupational Health Services in Malaysia.
Samsuddin, Niza;Razali, Ailin;Rahman, Nor Azlina Ab;Yusof, Muhammad Zubir;Mahmood, Nik Ahmad Kamal Nik;Hair, Ahmad Fitri Abdullah;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 131-137
321 views DOI Abstract
2016
multiple eccrine spiradenomas in zosteriform distribution involving three dermatomes
;Mahimanjan Saha;Vaswatee Madhab;Surjya Sekhar Das;C Zohra Begum
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 75-76
187 views DOI Abstract
2023
Health Information-Seeking Behaviour on High-Risk Behaviour among Adolescents.
Ab Hakimee, Nabila Iezzah;Atan, Ashikin;Sutantri, Sutantri;Lee, Siew Pien;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 181-191
104 views DOI Abstract
2020
Risk Factors for Suicidal Behaviours after Natural Disasters: A Systematic Review.
Jafari, Hamid;Heidari, Mohammad;Heidari, Samaneh;Sayfouri, Nasrin;
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 20-33
102 views DOI Abstract
2023
Stunting and Its Associated Factors among Children Below 5 Years Old on the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia: Evidence from the National Health and Morbidity Survey.
Haron, Muhammad Zulfahmi;Rohana, Abdul Jalil;Hamid, Noor Aman A;Omar, Mohd Azahadi;Abdullah, Noor Hashimah;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 155-168
93 views DOI Abstract
2023
A Scoping Review on Medicinal Properties of () Based on Malay Medical Manuscripts and Scientific Literatures.
Zamri, Nur Fatin Idayu;Mohd Shafri, Mohd Affendi;Zamli, Zaitunnatakhin;Mamat, Suhana;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 23-39
88 views DOI Abstract
2023
Pain as a Guide in Glasgow Coma Scale Status for Neurological Assessment.
Nallaluthan, Vasu;Tan, Guan Yan;Murni, Mohamed Fuad;Saleh, Umaira;Abdul Halim, Sanihah;Idris, Zamzuri;Ghani, Abdul Rahman Izaini;Abdullah, Jafri Malin;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 221-235
83 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.