brazilian journal of medical and biological research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#383 / 33,810
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 14 hours ago

brazilian journal of medical and biological research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj ulakbim
Short Name brazilian journal of medical and biological research
Abbreviated Name brazilian journal of medical and biological research
ISSN 0100-879X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2002
Evaluation of antivenoms in the neutralization of hyperalgesia and edema induced by Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops asper snake venoms
G., Picolo;M., Chacur;J.M., Gutiérrez;C.F.P., Teixeira;Y., Cury;
Vol. 35 , No. 10 , pp. 1221-1228
400 views Abstract
2012
Participation of cannabinoid receptors in peripheral nociception induced by some NSAIDs
Silva, L.C.R.;Romero, T.R.L.;Guzzo, L.S.;Duarte, I.D.G.;
Vol. 45 , No. 12 , pp. 1240-1243
361 views Abstract
2012
High sensitivity C-reactive protein distribution in the elderly: the Bambuí Cohort Study, Brazil
Assunção, L.G.S.;Eloi-Santos, S.M.;Peixoto, S.V.;
Vol. 45 , No. 12 , pp. 1284-1286
351 views Abstract
2017
international human right and islamic law: sebuah upaya “menuntaskan” wacana-wacana kemanusiaan
;Febri Hijroh Mukhlis
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 285-307
323 views DOI Abstract
2008
Comparison of scientists of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences and of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA on the basis of the h-index
Mugnaini, R.;Packer, A.L.;Meneghini, R.;
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 258-262
321 views Abstract
2010
Differential binding with ERα and ERβ of the phytoestrogen-rich plant Pueraria mirifica
Boonchird, C.;Mahapanichkul, T.;Cherdshewasart, W.;
Vol. 43 , No. 2 , pp. 195-200
285 views Abstract
2013
Immunohistochemical detection of virus through its nuclear cytopathic effect in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia other than acute exacerbation
Santos, G.C. dos;Parra, E.R.;Stegun, F.W.;Cirqueira, C.S.;Capelozzi, V.L.;
Vol. 46 , No. 11 , pp. 985-992
283 views Abstract
2016
al-maw’izah al-hasanah (telaah atas metode dakwah dalam al-qur’an dan al-sunnah)
;Abu Bakar
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 79-94
280 views DOI Abstract
0000
Molecular detection of Leishmania spp in Lutzomyia longipalpis in the city of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Castro, J.C.;Bueno, L.L.;Milagres, T.F.;Rêgo, F.D.;Gontijo, C.M.F.;Peconick, A.P.;Andrade, A.J.;Barçante, T.A.;Barçante, J.M.P.;
Vol. 52 , No. 9 , pp. -
271 views Abstract
2006
High expression of human carboxypeptidase M in Pichia pastoris: Purification and partial characterization
R.B., Craveiro;J.D., Ramalho;J.R., Chagas;P.H.M., Wang;D.E., Casarini;J.L., Pesquero;R.C., Araújo;J.B., Pesquero;
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 211-217
265 views Abstract
View All 22 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.