Indexed in Journament

lecture notes in informatics (lni), proceedings - series of the gesellschaft fur informatik (gi)

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,219 of 23,132 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 42.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name lecture notes in informatics (lni), proceedings - series of the gesellschaft fur informatik (gi)
Abbreviated Name lecture notes in informatics (lni), proceedings - series of the gesellschaft fur informatik (gi)

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.0
Accessibility 15.0 19.4
Timeliness 50.0 37.9
Diversity 30.0 30.1
Innovation 40.0 37.2
Community Impact 30.0 25.5
Content Distribution 73.5 85.4
Content Quality — 54.2
Ethics & Transparency — 39.5
Editorial Standards — 32.5
Publication Regularity — 51.6
Geographic Reach — 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2017
assessment of the educational environment of physiotherapy students at the university of rwanda using the dundee ready educational environment measure dreem
;G Urimubenshi;J Songa;F Kandekwe
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 103-106
404 views DOI Abstract
2017
occupational therapy students’ perspectives on the core competencies of graduates to practise in the field of neurology
;L Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi;J Bester;K Gatley-Dewing;S Holmes;C Jacobs;B Sadler;I van der Walt
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 39-43
272 views DOI Abstract
2013
Change management of Germany's public IT-project for feedback management in schools (SEIS)
Von, Viebahn C.
Vol. P-221 , pp. 264-265
268 views
2016
assessing the effect of an online hiv/aids course on 1styear pharmacy students’ knowledge
;Fatima Suleman
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 108-112
226 views DOI Abstract
2016
SMART lecture - The technology-aided new orientation of the lecture towards an interactive learning environment for self-regulated learning
Braun, I.
Vol. P-259 , pp. 1041-1050
223 views
2015
an exploration of the experiences and practices of nurse academics regarding postgraduate research supervision at a south african university
;J Naidoo;S Mthembu
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 216-219
193 views DOI Abstract
2017
barriers to continuous professional development participation for radiographers in kenya
;L Kanamu;B van Dyk;L Chipeya;S Kilaha
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 17-20
191 views DOI Abstract
2015
changing students’ moral reasoning ability – is it at all possible
;N Nortjé;K Esterhuyse
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 180-182
190 views DOI Abstract
2014
Risk management by banks alongside agricultural value-added chains: Business/fiscal aspects and requirements
Wesselmann, G.
Vol. P-226 , pp. 153-156
186 views
2015
Business IT alignment in municipalities - Qualitative research based on three larger Bernese municipalities
Walser, K.
Vol. 246 , pp. 797-811
169 views
2017
assessment of the educational environment of physiotherapy students at the university of rwanda using the dundee ready educational environment measure dreem
;G Urimubenshi;J Songa;F Kandekwe
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 103-106
404 views DOI Abstract
2017
occupational therapy students’ perspectives on the core competencies of graduates to practise in the field of neurology
;L Jacobs-Nzuzi Khuabi;J Bester;K Gatley-Dewing;S Holmes;C Jacobs;B Sadler;I van der Walt
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 39-43
272 views DOI Abstract
2017
barriers to continuous professional development participation for radiographers in kenya
;L Kanamu;B van Dyk;L Chipeya;S Kilaha
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 17-20
191 views DOI Abstract
2017
the use of lowcost simulation in a resourceconstrained teaching environment
;M Mwandri;M Walsh;J Frantz;R Delport
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 168-170
138 views DOI Abstract
2017
scholarship for africa: are we taking it seriously enough
;S van Schalkwyk
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 161-161
113 views DOI Abstract
2016
the noma track module on nutrition human rights and governance: part 2 a transnational curriculum using a human rightsbased approach to foster key competencies in nutrition professionals
;M Marais;M McLachlan;W Eide
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 160 - 165
165 views DOI Abstract
2016
assessing the effect of an online hiv/aids course on 1styear pharmacy students’ knowledge
;Fatima Suleman
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 108-112
226 views DOI Abstract
2016
beyond the lecture: teaching for professional development
;M Rowe
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 208 - 210
126 views DOI Abstract
2016
SMART lecture - The technology-aided new orientation of the lecture towards an interactive learning environment for self-regulated learning
Braun, I.
Vol. P-259 , pp. 1041-1050
223 views
2015
changing students’ moral reasoning ability – is it at all possible
;N Nortjé;K Esterhuyse
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 180-182
190 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,219 of 23,132 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

30.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.