Indexed in Journament

ecological applications : a publication of the ecological society of america

ISSN 1051-0761· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,897 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 52.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ecol appl
Abbreviated Name ecol appl
ISSN 1051-0761
URL https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19395582

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 40.5 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 59.0 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2020
Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
Talal, Michelle L;Santelmann, Mary V;
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Overlooked side effects of organic farming inputs attract soil insect crop pests.
Nyamwasa, Innocent;Li, Kebin;Zhang, Shuai;Yin, Jiao;Li, Xiaofeng;Liu, Jie;Li, Ertao;Sun, Xiulian;
418 views DOI Abstract
2017
Fit to predict? Eco-informatics for predicting the catchability of a pelagic fish in near real time.
Scales, Kylie L;Hazen, Elliott L;Maxwell, Sara M;Dewar, Heidi;Kohin, Suzanne;Jacox, Michael G;Edwards, Christopher A;Briscoe, Dana K;Crowder, Larry B;Lewison, Rebecca L;Bograd, Steven J;
Vol. 27 , No. 8 , pp. 2313-2329
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Northern forest winters have lost cold, snowy conditions that are important for ecosystems and human communities.
Contosta, Alexandra R;Casson, Nora J;Garlick, Sarah;Nelson, Sarah J;Ayres, Matthew P;Burakowski, Elizabeth A;Campbell, John;Creed, Irena;Eimers, Catherine;Evans, Celia;Fernandez, Ivan;Fuss, Colin;Huntington, Thomas;Patel, Kaizad;Sanders-DeMott, Rebecca;Son, Kyongho;Templer, Pamela;Thornbrugh, Casey;
, pp. e01974
396 views DOI Abstract
2018
Finding politically feasible conservation policies: the case of wildlife trafficking.
Haas, Timothy C;Ferreira, Sam M;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 473-494
392 views DOI Abstract
2020
Weighting and aggregating expert ecological judgments.
Hemming, Victoria;Hanea, Anca M;Walshe, Terry;Burgman, Mark A;
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spatial conservation planning under uncertainty: adapting to climate change risks using modern portfolio theory.
Eaton, Mitchell J;Yurek, Simeon;Haider, Zulqarnain;Martin, Julien;Johnson, Fred A;Udell, Bradley J;Charkhgard, Hadi;Kwon, Changhyun;
, pp. e01962
355 views DOI Abstract
2007
Introduction history and habitat variation explain the landscape genetics of hybrid tiger salamanders.
Fitzpatrick, Benjamin M;Shaffer, H Bradley;
Vol. 17 , No. 2 , pp. 598-608
347 views Abstract
2020
Influence of protogynous sex change on recovery of fish populations within marine protected areas.
Easter, E E;Adreani, M S;Hamilton, S L;Steele, M A;Pang, S;White, J W;
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Estimating offsets for avian displacement effects of anthropogenic impacts.
Shaffer, Jill A;Loesch, Charles R;Buhl, Deborah A;
, pp. e01983
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modifications of the rainforest frugivore community are associated with reduced seed removal at the community level.
Boissier, Olivier;Feer, François;Henry, Pierre-Yves;Forget, Pierre-Michel;
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Overlooked side effects of organic farming inputs attract soil insect crop pests.
Nyamwasa, Innocent;Li, Kebin;Zhang, Shuai;Yin, Jiao;Li, Xiaofeng;Liu, Jie;Li, Ertao;Sun, Xiulian;
418 views DOI Abstract
2020
Weighting and aggregating expert ecological judgments.
Hemming, Victoria;Hanea, Anca M;Walshe, Terry;Burgman, Mark A;
383 views DOI Abstract
2020
Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
Talal, Michelle L;Santelmann, Mary V;
457 views DOI Abstract
2020
Influence of protogynous sex change on recovery of fish populations within marine protected areas.
Easter, E E;Adreani, M S;Hamilton, S L;Steele, M A;Pang, S;White, J W;
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
Does the leaf economic spectrum hold within plant functional types? A Bayesian multivariate trait meta-analysis.
Shiklomanov, Alexey N;Cowdery, Elizabeth M;Bahn, Michael;Byun, Chaeho;Jansen, Steven;Kramer, Koen;Minden, Vanessa;Niinemets, Ülo;Onoda, Yusuke;Soudzilovskaia, Nadejda A;Dietze, Michael C;
228 views DOI Abstract
2019
Vegetation dynamics following compound disturbance in a dry pine forest: fuel treatment then bark beetle outbreak.
Crotteau, Justin S;Keyes, Christopher R;Hood, Sharon M;Larson, Andrew J;
276 views DOI Abstract
2019
Designing flows to enhance ecosystem functioning in heavily altered rivers.
Bestgen, Kevin R;Poff, N Leroy;Baker, Daniel W;Bledsoe, Brian P;Merritt, David M;Lorie, Mark;Auble, Gregor T;Sanderson, John S;Kondratieff, Boris C;
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Estimating offsets for avian displacement effects of anthropogenic impacts.
Shaffer, Jill A;Loesch, Charles R;Buhl, Deborah A;
, pp. e01983
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Will growing invasive arthropod biodiversity outpace our ability for eradication?
Suckling, David M;Stringer, Lloyd D;Baird, David B;Kean, John M;
, pp. e01992
231 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
34.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,897 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

40.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.