Indexed in Journament

drinking water engineering and science

ISSN 1996-9457· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,011 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 82.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

الاسم المختصر drinking water engineering and science
الاسم المختصر drinking water engineering and science
ISSN 1996-9457

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.0
Content Distribution 81.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity — 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.0 7.8
Content Distribution 81.4 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2016
variation and correlations among european and north american orchardgrass germplasm for herbage yield and nutritive value
;Joseph G. Robins;B. Shaun Bushman;Ulf Feuerstein;Greg Blaser
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 61-
401 views DOI Abstract
2016
evidence for heterosis in italian ryegrass (lolium multiflorum lam.) based on inbreeding depression in f2 generation offspring from biparental crosses
;Junping Wang;Luke W. Pembleton;Noel O. I. Cogan;John W. Forster
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 49-
380 views DOI Abstract
2013
a review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics
;Christoph Müller;Claudia Kammann;Tim J. Clough;Leo M. Condron
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 275-293
366 views DOI Abstract
2012
evaluation of maize germplasm for resistance to aflatoxin accumulation
;Michael H. Blanco;Gary L. Windham;W. Brien Henry
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 28-39
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
evaluating biochar-microbe synergies for improved growth, yield of maize, and post-harvest soil characteristics in a semi-arid climate
;Maqshoof Ahmad;Xiukang Wang;Thomas H. Hilger;Muhammad Luqman;Farheen Nazli;Azhar Hussain;Zahir Ahmad Zahir;Muhammad Latif;Qudsia Saeed;Hina Ahmed Malik;Adnan Mustafa
Vol. 10 , No. 1055 , pp. 1055-
358 views DOI Abstract
2018
effects of maize residue biochar amendments on soil properties and soil loss on acidic hutton soil
;Patrick Nyambo;Thembalethu Taeni;Cornelius Chiduza;Tesfay Araya
Vol. 8 , No. 11 , pp. 256-
345 views DOI Abstract
2013
impact of biochar on organic contaminants in soil: a tool for mitigating risk?
;Kirk T. Semple;Uchenna Ogbonnaya
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 349-375
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
yield stability in winter wheat production: a survey on german farmers’ and advisors’ views
;Janna Macholdt;Bernd Honermeier
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 45-
322 views DOI Abstract
2008
Modeling of RO/NF membrane rejections of PhACs and organic compounds: a statistical analysis
Amy, G.;Kennedy, M.;Kim, T.-U.;Yangali-Quintanilla, V.;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 7-15
319 views Abstract
2015
a review of nutrient management studies involving finger millet in the semi-arid tropics of asia and africa
;Malinda S. Thilakarathna;Manish N. Raizada
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 262-290
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
effects of soft rock and biochar applications on millet (<i>setaria italica</i> l.) crop performance in sandy soil
;Yingying Sun;Ningning Zhang;Jiakun Yan;Suiqi Zhang
Vol. 10 , No. 669 , pp. 669-
263 views DOI Abstract
2020
base neutralizing capacity of agricultural soils in a quaternary landscape of north-east germany and its relationship to best management practices in lime requirement determination
;Sebastian Vogel;Eric Bönecke;Charlotte Kling;Eckart Kramer;Katrin Lück;Anne Nagel;Golo Philipp;Jörg Rühlmann;Ingmar Schröter;Robin Gebbers
Vol. 10 , No. 877 , pp. 877-
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
biochar mitigates combined effects of drought and salinity stress in quinoa
;Aizheng Yang;Saqib Saleem Akhtar;Lin Li;Qiang Fu;Quanfeng Li;Muhammad Asif Naeem;Xinyao He;Ze Zhang;Sven-Erik Jacobsen
Vol. 10 , No. 912 , pp. 912-
288 views DOI Abstract
2020
optimization of light interception, leaf area and yield in “wa38”: comparisons among training systems, rootstocks and pruning techniques
;Brendon Anthony;Sara Serra;Stefano Musacchi
Vol. 10 , No. 689 , pp. 689-
231 views DOI Abstract
2020
interaction between humic substances and plant hormones for phosphorous acquisition
;Keiji Jindo;Luciano Pasqualoto Canellas;Alfonso Albacete;Lidiane Figueiredo dos Santos;Rafael Luiz Frinhani Rocha;Daiane Carvalho Baia;Natália Oliveira Aguiar Canellas;Travis Luc Goron;Fábio Lopes Olivares
Vol. 10 , No. 640 , pp. 640-
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
johnsongrass (<i>sorghum halepense</i> (l.) pers.) interference, control and recovery under different management practices and its effects on the grain yield and quality of maize crop
;Anestis Karkanis;Despoina Athanasiadou;Kyriakos Giannoulis;Konstantina Karanasou;Spyridon Zografos;Spyridon Souipas;Dimitrios Bartzialis;Nicholaos Danalatos
Vol. 10 , No. 2 , pp. 266-
282 views DOI Abstract
2020
evaluating biochar-microbe synergies for improved growth, yield of maize, and post-harvest soil characteristics in a semi-arid climate
;Maqshoof Ahmad;Xiukang Wang;Thomas H. Hilger;Muhammad Luqman;Farheen Nazli;Azhar Hussain;Zahir Ahmad Zahir;Muhammad Latif;Qudsia Saeed;Hina Ahmed Malik;Adnan Mustafa
Vol. 10 , No. 1055 , pp. 1055-
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
coronatine enhances stalk bending resistance of maize, thickens the cell wall and decreases the area of the vascular bundles
;Yanxia Li;Guanmin Huang;Yuling Guo;Yuyi Zhou;Liusheng Duan
Vol. 10 , No. 807 , pp. 807-
251 views DOI Abstract
2019
sensitivity of three phosphate extraction methods to the application of phosphate species differing in immediate plant availability
;Tobias Edward Hartmann;Iris Wollmann;Yawen You;Torsten Müller
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 29-
196 views DOI Abstract
2019
phospholipase d (pld) response to water stress in citrus roots and leaves
;Fernando Alferez;Jian Wu;James H. Graham
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 45-
292 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,011 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.