journal of molecular modeling | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7577 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 15 hours ago

journal of molecular modeling

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name j mol model
Abbreviated Name journal of molecular modeling
ISSN 0948-5023
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/894
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2019
Computational study of metal complexes formed with EDTA, melatonin, and its main metabolites: implications in lead intoxication and clues to a plausible alternative treatment.
Díaz-Cervantes, Erik;García-Revilla, Marco A;Soto-Arredondo, Karla;Villaseñor-Granados, Tayde;Martínez-Alfaro, Minerva;Robles, Juvencio;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 18
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
Quantum-chemical studies of homoleptic iridium(III) complexes in OLEDs: fac versus mer isomers
Grzelak I.
Vol. 25 , pp. 0-0
404 views DOI
2020
Glyphosate adsorption on C fullerene in aqueous medium for water reservoir depollution.
Lima, J D M;Gomes, D S;Frazão, N F;Soares, D J B;Sarmento, R G;
Vol. 26 , No. 5 , pp. 110
399 views DOI Abstract
2019
Organometallic complexes of carbon nanotori.
Del Castillo, Roxana M;Miralrio, Alan;Rios, Citlalli;Salcedo, Roberto;
Vol. 25 , No. 8 , pp. 239
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Theoretical investigation of the structure, detonation properties, and stability of bicyclo[3.2.1]octane derivatives.
Du, Mingran;Han, Tifei;Liu, Feng;Wu, Hongbo;
Vol. 25 , No. 8 , pp. 253
358 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparative cation sensing properties of a newly designed urea linked ferrocene-benzimidazole dyad: a DFT study.
Sarikavak, Kübra;Kurtay, Gülbin;Sevin, Fatma;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 50
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Structure and bonding in triorganotin chlorides: a perspective from energy decomposition analysis.
Rocha, Marcus V J;Vilhena, Felipe S;Signorelli, Matheus R M;de M Carneiro, José W;Ramalho, Teodorico C;Costa, Luciano T;
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 279
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
A model of atomic compressibility and its application in QSAR domain for toxicological property prediction.
Tandon, Hiteshi;Chakraborty, Tanmoy;Suhag, Vandana;
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 303
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Understanding the anticorrosive mechanism of a cross-linked supramolecular polymer for mild steel in the condensate water: comprehensive experimental, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics investigations.
Ma, Yucong;Zhou, Tingting;Zhu, Wenqin;Fan, Baomin;Liu, Hao;Fan, Guifeng;Hao, Hua;Sun, Hui;Yang, Biao;
Vol. 26 , No. 4 , pp. 81
339 views DOI Abstract
2014
Quantum chemical studies on three novel 1,2,4-triazole N-oxides as potential insensitive high explosives
Wu, Q.
Vol. 20 , pp. 1-9
320 views DOI
View All 27 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.