journal of clinical hypertension (greenwich, conn) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2358 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ أسبوعين

journal of clinical hypertension (greenwich, conn)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
ncbi
الاسم المختصر j clin hypertens (greenwich)
الاسم المختصر j clin hypertens (greenwich)
ISSN 1751-7176
الهدف والنطاق
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17517176
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Expert panel consensus recommendations for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Asia: The HOPE Asia Network.
Kario, Kazuomi;Shin, Jinho;Chen, Chen-Huan;Buranakitjaroen, Peera;Chia, Yook-Chin;Divinagracia, Romeo;Nailes, Jennifer;Hoshide, Satoshi;Siddique, Saulat;Sison, Jorge;Soenarta, Arieska Ann;Sogunuru, Guru Prasad;Tay, Jam Chin;Teo, Boon Wee;Turana, Yuda;Zhang, Yuqing;Park, Sungha;Van Minh, Huynh;Wang, Ji-Guang;
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. 1250-1283
435 views DOI Abstract
2019
Machine learning and blood pressure.
Santhanam, Prasanna;Ahima, Rexford S;
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Screening for hypertension using emergency department blood pressure measurements can identify patients with undiagnosed hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
Armitage, Laura C;Whelan, Maxine E;Watkinson, Peter J;Farmer, Andrew J;
378 views DOI Abstract
2020
What is new in the 2018 Chinese hypertension guideline and the implication for the management of hypertension in Asia?
Wang, Ji-Guang;Chia, Yook-Chin;Chen, Chen-Huan;Park, Sungha;Hoshide, Satoshi;Tomitani, Naoko;Kabutoya, Tomoyuki;Shin, Jinho;Turana, Yuda;Soenarta, Arieska Ann;Tay, Jam Chin;Buranakitjaroen, Peera;Nailes, Jennifer;Van Minh, Huynh;Siddique, Saulat;Sison, Jorge;Sogunuru, Guru Prasad;Sukonthasarn, Apichard;Teo, Boon Wee;Verma, Narsingh;Zhang, Yu-Qing;Wang, Tzung-Dau;Kario, Kazuomi;
347 views DOI Abstract
2019
Down-regulation of miRNA 145 and up-regulation of miRNA 4516 may be associated with primary hypertension.
Özkan, Gülsüm;Ulusoy, Şükrü;Geyik, Elif;Erdem, Yunus;
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of the ambient temperature on blood pressure and how it will affect the epidemiology of hypertension in Asia.
Park, Sungha;Kario, Kazuomi;Chia, Yook-Chin;Turana, Yuda;Chen, Chen-Huan;Buranakitjaroen, Peera;Nailes, Jennifer;Hoshide, Satoshi;Siddique, Saulat;Sison, Jorge;Soenarta, Arieska Ann;Sogunuru, Guru Prasad;Tay, Jam Chin;Teo, Boon Wee;Zhang, Yu-Qing;Shin, Jinho;Van Minh, Huynh;Tomitani, Naoko;Kabutoya, Tomoyuki;Sukonthasarn, Apichard;Verma, Narsingh;Wang, Tzung-Dau;Wang, Ji-Guang;, ;
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is obstructive sleep apnoea the most important determinant of reverse dipping? Hypothesis and evidence.
Cuspidi, Cesare;Gherbesi, Elisa;Tadic, Marijana;
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
An overview of hypertension and cardiac involvement in Asia: Focus on heart failure.
Soenarta, Arieska Ann;Buranakitjaroen, Peera;Chia, Yook-Chin;Chen, Chen-Huan;Nailes, Jennifer;Hoshide, Satoshi;Minh, Huynh Van;Park, Sungha;Shin, Jinho;Siddique, Saulat;Sison, Jorge;Sogunuru, Guru Prasad;Sukonthasarn, Apichard;Tay, Jam Chin;Teo, Boon Wee;Turana, Yuda;Verma, Narsingh;Wang, Tzung-Dau;Zhang, Yu-Qing;Wang, Ji-Guang;Kario, Kazuomi;
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk profile in hypertensive patients under specialist care in Argentina: Results from the CHARTER study.
Marín, Marcos;Barochiner, Jessica;Rodríguez, Pablo;Renna, Nicolás;Castellaro, Carlos;Espeche, Walter;De Cerchio, Alejandro;Del Sueldo, Mildren;Vissani, Sergio;Zilberman, Judith;
286 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measurement of central augmentation index by three different methods and techniques: Agreement among Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph devices.
Papaioannou, Theodore G;Thymis, John;Benas, Dimitrios;Triantafyllidi, Helen;Kostelli, Gavriela;Pavlidis, George;Kousathana, Fotini;Katogiannis, Kostantinos;Vlastos, Dimitrios;Lambadiari, Vaia;Papadavid, Evangelia;Parissis, John;Tousoulis, Dimitrios;Ikonomidis, Ignatios;
278 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.