Indexed in Journament

journal of clinical hypertension (greenwich, conn)

ISSN 1751-7176· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8/100
Journament Score
#3,585
Journament Rank
14
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name j clin hypertens (greenwich)
Abbreviated Name j clin hypertens (greenwich)
ISSN 1751-7176
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17517176

Indexings

ncbi

Publications Per Year

Articles (14)

2019
Expert panel consensus recommendations for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Asia: The HOPE Asia Network.
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. 1250-1283
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Machine learning and blood pressure.
397 views DOI Abstract
2020
What is new in the 2018 Chinese hypertension guideline and the implication for the management of hypertension in Asia?
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Down-regulation of miRNA 145 and up-regulation of miRNA 4516 may be associated with primary hypertension.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of the ambient temperature on blood pressure and how it will affect the epidemiology of hypertension in Asia.
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is obstructive sleep apnoea the most important determinant of reverse dipping? Hypothesis and evidence.
317 views DOI Abstract
2020
An overview of hypertension and cardiac involvement in Asia: Focus on heart failure.
308 views DOI Abstract
2019
Blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk profile in hypertensive patients under specialist care in Argentina: Results from the CHARTER study.
294 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measurement of central augmentation index by three different methods and techniques: Agreement among Arteriograph, Complior, and Mobil-O-Graph devices.
285 views DOI Abstract
2025
Advanced Practice Nurse Intervention Versus Usual Care for Hypertension Control: A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Vol. 27 , pp. e70068
58 views DOI Abstract
2020
The first study comparing a wearable watch-type blood pressure monitor with a conventional ambulatory blood pressure monitor on in-office and out-of-office settings.
173 views DOI Abstract
2020
An overview of hypertension and cardiac involvement in Asia: Focus on heart failure.
308 views DOI Abstract
2020
What is new in the 2018 Chinese hypertension guideline and the implication for the management of hypertension in Asia?
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comparison of day-to-day blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to those without diabetes: Asia BP@Home Study.
242 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of the ambient temperature on blood pressure and how it will affect the epidemiology of hypertension in Asia.
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
Down-regulation of miRNA 145 and up-regulation of miRNA 4516 may be associated with primary hypertension.
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Machine learning and blood pressure.
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Expert panel consensus recommendations for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in Asia: The HOPE Asia Network.
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. 1250-1283
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of new hypertension guidelines on target organ damage screening in a Shanghai community-dwelling population.
183 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.