acs applied materials and interfaces | Journament

Journal Ranking

#457 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 วันที่แล้ว

acs applied materials and interfaces

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
การจัดทำดัชนี
scopus
ชื่อย่อ acs applied materials and interfaces
ชื่อตัวย่อ acs applied materials and interfaces
ISSN
วัตถุประสงค์และขอบเขต
URL
คำแนะนำสำหรับผู้เขียน

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2019
Pure Red Iridium(III) Complexes Possessing Good Electron Mobility with 1,5-Naphthyridin-4-ol Derivatives for High-Performance OLEDs with an EQE over 31%
Lu G.
Vol. 11 , pp. 20192-20199
331 views DOI
2019
Polydopamine-Based Interfacial Engineering of Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels for the Construction and Long-Term Maintenance of Living Three-Dimensional Tissues
Park, S.
Vol. 11 , pp. 23919-23925
281 views DOI
2015
variaÇÕes da carga sedimentar de fundo e morfologia dos perfis transversais batimÉtricos no trecho inferior da bacia do alto rio branco, roraima
;Carlos Sander;Nelson Gasparetto;Manoel Santos
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 130-145
234 views DOI Abstract
2013
efeitos antrÓpicos e suas implicaÇÕes na bacia hidrogrÁfica do rio carapÁ, colÍder –mato grosso/brasil
;Norma Aparecida de Oliveira Nobre;Cassiano Garcia Roque;Aumeri Carlos Bampi
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 70-80
223 views Abstract
2010
Colorimetric detection of mercury(II) ion using unmodified silver nanoparticles and mercury-specific oligonucleotides
Wang, Y.
Vol. 2 , pp. 339-342
222 views DOI
2019
Retraction of: Flexible and microporous chitosan hydrogel/nano ZnO composite bandages for wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation (ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (2012) 4:5 (2618-2629) DOI: 10.1021/am300292v)
Kumar, P.
Vol. 11 , pp. 28596
221 views DOI
2019
Ultrafast Response Polyelectrolyte Humidity Sensor for Respiration Monitoring
Dai, J.
, pp. 0-0
217 views DOI
2015
avaliaÇÃo da erosÃo na margem direita do rio paraguai a jusante da praia do juliÃo municÍpio de caceres-mt
;Aguinaldo Silva;Célia Alves Souza;Hiran Zani
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. -
216 views DOI Abstract
2011
aplicaÇÃo do modelo swat para estudo de cenÁrios hipotÉticos na bacia hidrogrÁfica do riacho dos namorados no cariri paraibano
;José Guimarães de Carvalho Neto;Vajapeyam Srirangachar Srinivasan;Iana Alexandra Alvez Rufino
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 30-40
213 views Abstract
2008
a “litoralizaÇÃo” de camocim (ce) e o teritÓrio usado da praia de maceiÓ - ce / the “litoralizaÇÃo” of camocim (cearÁ state) and the used territory of the maceio beach – cearÁ state
;José Arilson
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 88-97
209 views Abstract
View All 31 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.