bmc geriatrics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4052 / 33,980
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

bmc geriatrics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name bmc geriatr
Abbreviated Name bmc geriatrics
ISSN 1471-2318
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/12877
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2018
Telemonitoring to improve nutritional status in community-dwelling elderly: design and methods for process and effect evaluation of a non-randomized controlled trial
Atten, M. N. van Doorn-van;Haveman-Nies, A.;Pilichowski, P.;Roca, R.;Vries, J. H. M. de;Groot, C. P. G. M. de;
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
545 views Abstract
2020
Development of a senior-specific, citizen-oriented healthcare service system in South Korea based on the Canadian 48/6 model of care.
Kim, Yoon-Sook;Lee, Jongmin;Moon, Yeonsil;Kim, Hee Joung;Shin, Jinyoung;Park, Jae-Min;Uhm, Kyeong Eun;Kim, Kyoung Jin;Yoo, Jung A;Oh, Yun Kyoung;Byeon, Pilsuk;Lee, Kunsei;Han, Seol-Heui;Choi, Jaekyung;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 32
497 views DOI Abstract
2019
Health systems readiness to provide geriatric friendly care services in Uganda: a cross-sectional study.
Ssensamba, Jude Thaddeus;Mukuru, Moses;Nakafeero, Mary;Ssenyonga, Ronald;Kiwanuka, Suzanne N;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 256
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
The (cost-) effectiveness of exergaming in people living with dementia and their informal caregivers: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
van Santen, Joeke;Dröes, Rose-Marie;Bosmans, Judith E;Blanson Henkemans, Olivier A;van Bommel, Sjef;Hakvoort, Esther;Valk, Ronald;Scholten, Carla;Wiersinga, Joris;van Straten, Annemieke;Meiland, Franka;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 50
455 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and validation of a screening tool for early identification of bloodstream infection in older patients - a retrospective case-control study.
Walker, Sandra A N;Bannerman, Heather;Ma, Nathan;Peragine, Christine;Elligsen, Marion;Palmay, Lesley;Williams, Evelyn;Liu, Barbara;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 6
437 views DOI Abstract
2011
Exposure to general anesthesia and risk of alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
P, Seitz Dallas;S, Shah Prakesh;Nathan, Herrmann;Joseph, Beyene;Naveed, Siddiqui;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 83-
401 views Abstract
2020
Social support and depressive symptoms among family caregivers of older people with disabilities in four provinces of urban China: the mediating role of caregiver burden.
Zhong, Yaqin;Wang, Jian;Nicholas, Stephen;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 3
388 views DOI Abstract
2015
Participation needs of older adults having disabilities and receiving home care: met needs mainly concern daily activities, while unmet needs mostly involve social activities.
Turcotte, Pier-Luc;Larivière, Nadine;Desrosiers, Johanne;Voyer, Philippe;Champoux, Nathalie;Carbonneau, Hélène;Carrier, Annie;Levasseur, Mélanie;
Vol. 15 , pp. 95
379 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmacist-led medication reviews for geriatric residents in German long-term care facilities
Bitter, Kerstin;Pehe, Christina;Krüger, Manfred;Heuer, Gabriela;Quinke, Regine;Jaehde, Ulrich;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-8
372 views Abstract
2020
Motor, cognitive and mobility deficits in 1000 geriatric patients: protocol of a quantitative observational study before and after routine clinical geriatric treatment - the ComOn-study.
Geritz, Johanna;Maetzold, Sara;Steffen, Maren;Pilotto, Andrea;Corrà, Marta F;Moscovich, Mariana;Rizzetti, Maria C;Borroni, Barbara;Padovani, Alessandro;Alpes, Annekathrin;Bang, Corinna;Barcellos, Igor;Baron, Ralf;Bartsch, Thorsten;Becktepe, Jos S;Berg, Daniela;Bergeest, Lu M;Bergmann, Philipp;Bouça-Machado, Raquel;Drey, Michael;Elshehabi, Morad;Farahmandi, Susan;Ferreira, Joaquim J;Franke, Andre;Friederich, Anja;Geisler, Corinna;Hüllemann, Philipp;Gierthmühlen, Janne;Granert, Oliver;Heinzel, Sebastian;Heller, Maren K;Hobert, Markus A;Hofmann, Marc;Jemlich, Björn;Kerkmann, Laura;Knüpfer, Stephanie;Krause, Katharina;Kress, Maximilian;Krupp, Sonja;Kudelka, Jennifer;Kuhlenbäumer, Gregor;Kurth, Roland;Leypoldt, Frank;Maetzler, Corina;Maia, Luis F;Moewius, Andreas;Neumann, Patricia;Niemann, Katharina;Ortlieb, Christian T;Paschen, Steffen;Pham, Minh H;Puehler, Thomas;Radloff, Franziska;Riedel, Christian;Rogalski, Marten;Sablowsky, Simone;Schanz, Elena M;Schebesta, Linda;Schicketmüller, Andreas;Studt, Simone;Thieves, Martina;Tönges, Lars;Ullrich, Sebastian;Urban, Peter P;Vila-Chã, Nuno;Wiegard, Anna;Warmerdam, Elke;Warnecke, Tobias;Weiss, Michael;Welzel, Julius;Hansen, Clint;Maetzler, Walter;
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 45
366 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.