Indexed in Journament

BMJ global health

ISSN 2059-7908· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.4 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,581 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
37 Articles
Scores higher than 91.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name BMJ Glob Health
Abbreviated Name bmj global health
ISSN 2059-7908
URL http://gh.bmj.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for BMJ global health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 60.0 12.6
Diversity 27.8 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 7.9 9.7
Content Distribution 77.5 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2019
Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality: reframing the entrenched problem of antibiotic overuse.
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. e001590
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
The NeoTree application: developing an integrated mHealth solution to improve quality of newborn care and survival in a district hospital in Malawi.
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. e000860
449 views DOI Abstract
2017
From blockchain technology to global health equity: can cryptocurrencies finance universal health coverage?
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. e000570
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
The distributional impact of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: findings from an extended cost-effectiveness analysis in South Africa.
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. e001317
441 views DOI Abstract
2018
Patterns of authorship on community health workers in low-and-middle-income countries: an analysis of publications (2012-2016).
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. e000797
426 views DOI Abstract
2018
Long-term impact of community-based participatory women's groups on child and maternal mortality and child disability: follow-up of a cluster randomised trial in rural Nepal.
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. e001024
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
Towards equitable surgical systems: development and outcomes of a national surgical, obstetric and anaesthesia plan in Tanzania.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. e001282
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
After the Astana declaration: is comprehensive primary health care set for success this time?
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. e001871
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Time trends and sociodemographic determinants of preterm births in pregnancy cohorts in Matlab, Bangladesh, 1990-2014.
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. e001462
395 views DOI Abstract
2025
The economics of climate-sensitive infectious diseases affecting human health in Latin America and the Caribbean: a scoping review.
Vol. 10
58 views DOI Abstract
2020
The reactive vaccination campaign against cholera emergency in camps for internally displaced persons, Borno, Nigeria, 2017: a two-stage cluster survey.
Vol. 5 , No. 6
253 views DOI Abstract
2020
"!" How lay health workers respond to barriers to uptake and retention in HIV care among pregnant and breastfeeding mothers in Malawi.
Vol. 5 , No. 6
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cancer diagnosis and care among rural-to-urban migrants in China.
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. e001923
207 views DOI Abstract
2019
The NeoTree application: developing an integrated mHealth solution to improve quality of newborn care and survival in a district hospital in Malawi.
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. e000860
449 views DOI Abstract
2019
'Never let a crisis go to waste': post-Ebola agenda-setting for health system strengthening in Guinea.
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. e001925
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ophthalmic services during ongoing conflict: the eye health system in Yemen.
Vol. 4 , No. 5 , pp. e001743
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
After the Astana declaration: is comprehensive primary health care set for success this time?
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. e001871
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Measuring progress towards universal health coverage: national and subnational analysis in Ethiopia.
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. e001843
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lay media reporting of monkeypox in Nigeria.
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. e002019
209 views DOI
Journament Score
42.4/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,581 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

27.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.