health education research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7317 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
60
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

health education research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name health educ res
Abbreviated Name health educ res
ISSN 1465-3648
Aim and Scope
URL http://her.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2018
Consumer perceptions of specific design characteristics for front-of-package nutrition labels.
Acton, R B;Vanderlee, L;Roberto, C A;Hammond, D;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 167-174
361 views DOI Abstract
2016
dyspnea in a case of shoulder dislocation – to beware of this rare life-threatening symptom
;Joshi Satyen Praful;Challawar Nikhil Subhash;Agrawal Parth Vinod;Gajjar Arpit S.
Vol. 2 , pp. 30-
293 views DOI Abstract
2015
Expanding school-district/university partnerships to advance health promoting schools implementation and efficacy in Taiwan.
Liu, Chieh-Hsing;Chang, Fong-Ching;Liao, Li-Ling;Niu, Yu-Zhen;Cheng, Chi-Chia;Shih, Shu-Fang;Chang, Tzu-Chau;Chou, Hsin-Pei;
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 638-46
289 views DOI Abstract
2014
'There's no place like home': perceptions of home-based HIV testing in Lesotho.
Mantell, J E;DiCarlo, A L;Remien, R H;Zerbe, A;Morris, D;Pitt, B;Nkonyana, J P;Abrams, E J;El-Sadr, W;
Vol. 29 , No. 3 , pp. 456-69
256 views DOI Abstract
2018
spino-pelvic radiological parameters in normal indian population
;Singh Roop;Yadav Sushil Kumar;Sood Sushma;Yadav Rohtas Kumar;Rohilla Ravi
Vol. 4 , pp. 14-
254 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving health communication with photographic images that increase identification in three minority populations.
Buller, M K;Bettinghaus, E P;Fluharty, L;Andersen, P A;Slater, M D;Henry, K L;Liu, X;Fullmer, S;Buller, D B;
Vol. 34 , No. 2 , pp. 145-158
237 views DOI Abstract
2011
Physical activity mass media campaigns and their evaluation: a systematic review of the literature 2003–2010
Leavy, Justine E.;Bull, Fiona C.;Rosenberg, Michael;Bauman, Adrian;
Vol. 26 , No. 6 , pp. 1060-1085
209 views Abstract
2006
Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: a review of qualitative studies
Steven Allender, Gill Cowburn, Charlie Foster
29 views DOI Abstract
2005
Health Behavior Theory and cumulative knowledge regarding health behaviors: are we moving in the right direction?
Seth M. Noar, Rick S. Zimmerman
26 views DOI Abstract
1988
Self-efficacy: the third factor besides attitude and subjective norm as a predictor of behavioural intentions
Hein de Vries, Margo Dijkstra, Piet Kuhlman
25 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
30
35
30
40
34
60
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.