Indexed in Journament

international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity

ISSN 1479-5868· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,854 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
39 Articles
Scores higher than 86.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Abbreviated Name int j behav nutr phys act
ISSN 1479-5868
URL https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 38.9 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 71.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (39)

2011
Adolescent girls' and parents' views on recruiting and retaining girls into an after-school dance intervention: implications for extra-curricular physical activity provision
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 91-
549 views Abstract
2019
Physical activity-related health and economic benefits of building walkable neighbourhoods: a modelled comparison between brownfield and greenfield developments.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 11
506 views DOI Abstract
2018
Short-term efficacy of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention for prostate and colorectal cancer patients and survivors: a randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 106
497 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of the first U.S. staple foods ordinance: impact on nutritional quality of food store offerings, customer purchases and home food environments.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 83
470 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying food marketing to teenagers: a scoping review.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 67
459 views DOI Abstract
2011
Can we use digital life-log images to investigate active and sedentary travel behaviour? Results from a pilot study
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 44-
459 views Abstract
2019
The development of the Comprehensive Analysis of Policy on Physical Activity (CAPPA) framework.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 60
455 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scale-up of the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) intervention in secondary schools: 12-month implementation outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
440 views DOI Abstract
2012
Recruiting and engaging new mothers in nutrition research studies: lessons from the Australian NOURISH randomised controlled trial
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 129-
416 views Abstract
2020
Neighbourhood drivability: environmental and individual characteristics associated with car use across Europe.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 8
406 views DOI Abstract
2024
Relative validity of an intelligent ordering system to estimate dietary intake among university students from a medical school in Shanghai, China.
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 70
106 views DOI Abstract
2021
Behaviours that prompt primary school teachers to adopt and implement physically active learning: a meta synthesis of qualitative evidence
71 views DOI Abstract
2021
Later sleep timing predicts accelerated summer weight gain among elementary school children: a prospective observational study.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 94
238 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scale-up of the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) intervention in secondary schools: 12-month implementation outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
440 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scale-up of the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) intervention in secondary schools: 12-month implementation outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Strategies used by the Canadian food and beverage industry to influence food and nutrition policies.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 3
388 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
Neighbourhood drivability: environmental and individual characteristics associated with car use across Europe.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 8
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Identifying food marketing to teenagers: a scoping review.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 67
459 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender and active travel: a qualitative data synthesis informed by machine learning.
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 135
331 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,854 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.