Indexed in Journament

egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2/100
Journament Score
#7,993
Journament Rank
41
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine
Abbreviated Name egyptian journal of radiology and nuclear medicine

Indexings

scopus

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2014
what does the brain of children with developmental dyslexia tell us about reading improvement?erp evidence from an intervention study
Vol. 8 , pp. -
383 views DOI Abstract
2015
effective artifact removal in resting state fmri data improves detection of dmn functional connectivity alteration in alzheimer’s disease
Vol. 9 , pp. -
381 views DOI Abstract
2013
self-associations influence task-performance through bayesian inference
Vol. 7 , pp. -
332 views DOI Abstract
2014
a formal model of interpersonal inference
Vol. 8 , pp. -
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
semantic memory and the hippocampus: revisiting, reaffirming, and extending the reach of their critical relationship
Vol. 13 , pp. -
316 views DOI Abstract
2012
investigating social gaze as an action-perception online performance
Vol. 6 , pp. -
315 views DOI Abstract
2018
editorial: new insights on basic and clinical aspects of eeg and meg connectome
Vol. 12 , pp. -
310 views DOI
2013
deficient fear conditioning in psychopathy as a function of interpersonal and affective disturbances
Vol. 7 , pp. -
296 views DOI Abstract
2020
semantic memory and the hippocampus: revisiting, reaffirming, and extending the reach of their critical relationship
Vol. 13 , pp. -
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
towards a multimodal model of cognitive workload through synchronous optical brain imaging and eye tracking measures
Vol. 13 , pp. -
264 views DOI Abstract
2019
naming and knowing revisited: eyetracking correlates of anomia in progressive aphasia
Vol. 13 , pp. -
255 views DOI Abstract
2019
beyond the low frequency fluctuations: morning and evening differences in human brain
Vol. 13 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
brain atrophy and reorganization of structural network in parkinson's disease with hemiparkinsonism
Vol. 12 , pp. -
231 views DOI Abstract
2018
automatic processing of changes in facial emotions in dysphoria: a magnetoencephalography study
Vol. 12 , pp. -
196 views DOI Abstract
2018
editorial: new insights on basic and clinical aspects of eeg and meg connectome
Vol. 12 , pp. -
310 views DOI
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.