matec web of conferences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#66 / 33,855
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
44
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

matec web of conferences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name matec web of conferences
Abbreviated Name matec web of conferences
ISSN 2261-236X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (300 total)

2018
Evaluation of tribological properties of components of polymer composite selflubricating materials
N., Dolgopolov Kirill;N., Lyubimov Dmitry;
Vol. 226 , pp. 01005-
556 views Abstract
2016
Investigation of Thermal Performance for Atria: a Method Overview
Leila, Moosavi;Norafida, Ghafar;Norhayati, Mahyuddin;
Vol. 66 , pp. 00029-
443 views Abstract
2018
Assessment of Infectious Waste Management Practices at Hospital with Excellent Accreditation Level in Bandung, Cimahi and East Jakarta, Indonesia
Novi, Fitria;Enri, Damanhuri;R.S, Salami Indah;
Vol. 147 , pp. 08004-
426 views Abstract
2018
Study on Electrical Properties of PALF Reinforced Bisphenol-A Composite
B., Vinod;J., Sudev L.;
Vol. 144 , pp. 02006-
423 views Abstract
2018
Characterisation of Arabica Coffee Pulp - Hay from Kintamani - Bali as Prospective Biogas Feedstocks
Roy, Hendroko Setyobudi;Satriyo, Krido Wahono;Praptiningsih, Gamawati Adinurani;Ahmad, Wahyudi;Wahyu, Widodo;Maizirwan, Mel;Yogo, Adhi Nugroho;Bayu, Prabowo;Tony, Liwang;
Vol. 164 , pp. 01039-
421 views Abstract
2017
A qualitative assessment of desertification change in the Tarfaya basin (Morocco) using panchromatic data of Landsat ETM+ and oli: sand encroachment approach
Ali, Aydda;Ahmed, Algouti;Abdellah, Algouti;
Vol. 120 , pp. 09002-
415 views Abstract
2017
Towards an information extraction and knowledge formation framework based on Shannon entropy
Dragoș, Iliescu;Marian, Gheorghe;
Vol. 94 , pp. 06013-
413 views Abstract
2019
Investigating causal factors of road damage: a case study
Dwi, Hatmoko Jati Utomo;Hario, Setiadji Bagus;Agung, Wibowo Mohammad;
Vol. 258 , pp. 02007-
411 views Abstract
2016
Thin film Encapsulations of Flexible Organic Light Emitting Diodes
Fa-Ta, Tsai;Ching-Kong, Chao;Pei-Sin, Jhu;Rwei-Ching, Chang;
Vol. 71 , pp. 04001-
409 views Abstract
2018
Blast Resistance of Slurry Infiltrated Fibre Concrete with Waste Steel Fibres from Tires
Martina, Drdlová;Oldřich, Sviták;Petr, Bibora;Miloslav, Popovič;René, Čechmánek;
Vol. 149 , pp. 01060-
394 views Abstract
View All 300 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
44
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

43.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.