Digital health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3220 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

Digital health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name Digit Health
Abbreviated Name digital health
ISSN 2055-2076
Aim and Scope
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal/digital-health
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

Improving health outcomes for young people with long term conditions: The role of digital communication in current and future patient-clinician communication for NHS providers of specialist clinical services for young people - LYNC study protocol.
Griffiths, Frances E;Atherton, Helen;Barker, Jack R;Cave, Jonathan Ak;Dennick, Kathryn;Dowdall, Peter;Fraser, Joe;Huxley, Caroline;Kim, Sung-Wook;Madan, Jason J;Matharu, Harjit;Musumadi, Luhanga;Palmer, Tom M;Paul, Moli;Sankaranarayanan, Sailesh;Slowther, Anne-Marie;Sujan, Mark A;Sutcliffe, Paul A;Sturt, Jackie;
Vol. 1 , pp. 2055207615593698
408 views DOI Abstract
Tailoring in the digital era: Stimulating dialogues on health topics in collaboration with social media influencers.
Lutkenhaus, Roel O;Jansz, Jeroen;Bouman, Martine Pa;
Vol. 5 , pp. 2055207618821521
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tailoring in the digital era: Stimulating dialogues on health topics in collaboration with social media influencers
Lutkenhaus, Roel O;Jansz, Jeroen;Bouman, Martine PA;
Vol. 5 , pp. -
367 views Abstract
Doctor YouTube's opinion on seasonal influenza: A critical appraisal of the information available to patients.
Kallur, Akhil;Albalbissi, Ahmad;Carillo-Martin, Ismael;Boonpheng, Boonphiphop;Kallur, Lakshmi;Kherallah, Yaman;Mahajan, Akhilesh;Mahapatra, Shayan;Mohan, Kaushik;Mohan, Priyasree;Reddy, Keerti;Sankhyan, Pratyaksha;Lopez-Alvarez, Sonia;Youssef, Dima;El Abbassi, Adel M;Gonzalez-Estrada, Alexei;
Vol. 6 , pp. 2055207620906968
345 views DOI Abstract
Re-thinking Digital Health: Data, Appisation and the (im)possibility of 'Opting out'.
Kuntsman, Adi;Miyake, Esperanza;Martin, Sam;
Vol. 5 , pp. 2055207619880671
342 views DOI Abstract
The impact of YouTube peer feedback on attitudes toward recovery from non-suicidal self-injury: An experimental pilot study.
Lewis, Stephen P;Seko, Yukari;Joshi, Poojan;
Vol. 4 , pp. 2055207618780499
337 views DOI Abstract
Stakeholder perspectives on evidence for digital mental health interventions: Implications for accreditation systems.
Batterham, Philip J;Calear, Alison L;O'Dea, Bridianne;Larsen, Mark E;J Kavanagh, David;Titov, Nickolai;March, Sonja;Hickie, Ian;Teesson, Maree;Dear, Blake F;Reynolds, Julia;Lowinger, Jocelyn;Thornton, Louise;Gorman, Patrick;
Vol. 5 , pp. 2055207619878069
326 views DOI Abstract
Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study.
Nadarzynski, Tom;Miles, Oliver;Cowie, Aimee;Ridge, Damien;
Vol. 5 , pp. 2055207619871808
301 views DOI Abstract
2016
Online support system for students in higher education: Proof-of-concept study
Touloumakos, Anna K;Goozée, Rhianna;Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta;Barley, Elizabeth;Haddad, Mark;Tzotzoli, Patapia;
Vol. 2 , pp. -
294 views Abstract
In search of a daily physical activity "sweet spot": Piloting a digital tracking intervention for people with multiple sclerosis.
Chiauzzi, Emil;Hekler, Eric B;Lee, Jisoo;Towner, Auriell;DasMahapatra, Pronabesh;Fitz-Randolph, Marcy;
Vol. 5 , pp. 2055207619872077
263 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.