computers, informatics, nursing : cin | Journament

Journal Ranking

#299 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
44.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

computers, informatics, nursing : cin

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name comput inform nurs
Abbreviated Name computers, informatics, nursing : cin
ISSN 1538-9774
Aim and Scope
URL https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/pages/default.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2019
The 7th Nursing Knowledge: Big Data Conference Brings Remarkable Accomplishments and Shows Staying Power on Key Fronts.
Delaney, Connie W;Weaver, Charlotte;
Vol. 37 , No. 9 , pp. 444-445
360 views DOI
2020
Usability Evaluation of Four Top-Rated Commercially Available Diabetes Apps for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.
Fu, Helen N C;Rizvi, Rubina F;Wyman, Jean F;Adam, Terrence J;
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of Electronic Health Records on the Nursing Process and Patient Outcomes Regarding Fall and Pressure Injuries.
Wu, Mei-Wen;Lee, Ting-Ting;Lai, Shu-Mei;Huang, Chi-Yi;Chang, Tsai-Hsiu;
333 views DOI Abstract
2018
Factors Affecting Consumer Acceptance of an Online Health Information Portal Among Young Internet Users.
Tao, Da;Yuan, Juan;Shao, Fenglian;Li, Debiao;Zhou, Qi;Qu, Xingda;
Vol. 36 , No. 11 , pp. 530-539
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
The Omaha System as a Structured Instrument for Bridging Nursing Informatics With Public Health Nursing Education: A Feasibility Study
not, found
Vol. 36 , pp. 314-315
323 views DOI
2011
Chronic health conditions and internet behavioral interventions: a review of factors to enhance user engagement
Schubart JR;Stuckey HL;Ganeshamoorthy A;Sciamanna CN;;
Vol. 29 , No. 2 , pp. -
316 views Abstract
2019
Implementation of Structured Documentation and Standard Nursing Statements: Perceptions of Nurses in Acute Care Settings.
Lee, Seonah;Jeon, Mi Yang;Kim, Eun Ok;
Vol. 37 , No. 5 , pp. 266-275
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
HIMSS-ANI Nursing Informatics Leadership Award Announced
Kwiatkoski, T.
Vol. 37 , pp. 123
282 views DOI
dificuldades para atividades básicas e instrumentais de vida diária, referidas por usuários de um centro de saúde escola do município de são paulo
;Maria Helena Morgani de Almeida;Julio Litvoc;Marina Picazzio Perez
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 187-200
272 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

44.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.