investigaciones regionales - journal of regional research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3633 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

investigaciones regionales - journal of regional research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name investigaciones regionales - journal of regional research
Abbreviated Name investigaciones regionales - journal of regional research
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (11 total)

2017
contextualización del inicio sexual y barreras individuales del uso de anticonceptivos en adolescentes de lima, huamanga e iquitos
;Gloria Carmona;Jessica Beltran;María Calderón;Marina Piazza;Susana Chávez
Vol. 34 , No. 4 , pp. 601-10
307 views DOI Abstract
2015
tem and ctx-m extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in klebsiella spp and escherichia coli isolates from inanimate surfaces of hospital environments
;Marco Rivera-Jacinto;Claudia Rodríguez-Ulloa;René Flores Clavo;Luis Serquén López;Zhandra Arce Gil
Vol. 32 , No. 4 , pp. 752-755
281 views DOI Abstract
2011
Spatial Hedonic Pricing Models for Testing the Adequacy of Acoustic Areas in Madrid, Spain
Montero, José-María;Fernández-Avilés, Gema;Mínguez, Román;
, No. 21 , pp. 157-181
281 views Abstract
2003
Política fiscal y crecimiento: nuevos resultados para las regiones españolas, 1967-1995
Rubio, Óscar Bajo;Roldán, Carmen Díaz;
, No. 3 , pp. 99-111
270 views Abstract
2005
distribución espacial, efecto estacional y tipode recipiente más común en los índices entomólogicos larvarios de aedes aegypti en yurimaguas. perú, 2000 - 2004
;Werther Fernández R;José Iannacone O;Eddy Rodríguez P;Neil Salazar C;Betsabet Valderrama R;Ana María Morales A
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 191-199
262 views Abstract
impacto económico de la desnutrición crónica, aguda y global en el perú
;Lorena Alcázar;Diego Ocampo;Lucio Huamán-Espino;Juan Pablo Aparco
Vol. 30 , No. 4 , pp. 569-574
256 views Abstract
2019
desarrollo y validación del método de amplificación isotérmica mediada en lazo para la detección del virus zika
;Oscar Escalante-Maldonado;Ronnie Gustavo Gavilán;Maria Paquita García;Adolfo Marcelo;Edson Pacheco;César Cabezas;Wataru Yamazaki
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. 442-7
245 views DOI Abstract
2004
Spatial disparities in the European Union: national and sectoral elements
Benito, Juan Miguel;Ezcurra, Roberto;
, No. 4 , pp. 75-98
245 views Abstract
2016
use of evidence in heath policies and programs contributions of the instituto nacional de salud
;Ericson L. Gutierrez;Marina Piazza;Alfonso Gutierrez-Aguado;Gisely Hijar;Gloria Carmona;Patricia Caballero;Nora Reyes;Carlos Canelo;Juan Pablo Aparco;Romina A. Tejada;Rafael Bolaños-Díaz;Silvia Saravia;Ernesto Gozzer
Vol. 33 , No. 3 , pp. 580-4
240 views DOI Abstract
2015
balancing risks and benefits of mammography screening for breast cancer: would you support its recommendation in peruvian women?
;Margarita Posso;Teresa Puig;Xavier Bonfill
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 117-128
240 views DOI Abstract
View All 11 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.