Indexed in Journament

eating and weight disorders

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,059 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
46 Articles
Scores higher than 7.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

ชื่อย่อ eating and weight disorders
ชื่อตัวย่อ eating and weight disorders
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/40519

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for eating and weight disorders
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 11.1 28.8
Innovation 42.0 31.2
Community Impact 2.1 13.4
Content Distribution 73.3 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (46)

2013
prevalence of peste des petits ruminants in the arid zone in the republic of niger
Vol. 80 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
303 views DOI Abstract
2007
a check list of the helminths of guineafowls (numididae) and a host list of these parasites
Vol. 74 , No. 4 , pp. 315-337
297 views DOI Abstract
2009
prospects for controlling trypanosomosis : vector-borne diseases : trypanosomosis
Vol. 76 , No. 1 , pp. 41-45
290 views DOI Abstract
2014
mobile technologies for disease surveillance in humans and animals
Vol. 81 , No. 2 , pp. e1-e5
288 views DOI Abstract
2008
value of tests for evaluating udder health in dairy goats: somatic cell counts, california milk cell test and electrical conductivity
Vol. 75 , No. 4 , pp. 279-287
278 views DOI Abstract
2008
evaluation of different adjuvants for foot-and-mouth disease vaccine containing all the sat serotypes
Vol. 75 , No. 1 , pp. 17-31
277 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of the infection with the nematode <i>haemonchus contortus</i> (strongylida: trichostrongylidae) on the haematological, biochemical, clinical and reproductive traits in rams
Vol. 83 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
276 views DOI Abstract
2011
the diagnosis and prevalence of persistent infection with bovine viral diarrhoea virus in south african feedlot cattle
Vol. 78 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
263 views DOI Abstract
2019
2017
differential virulence and tsetse fly transmissibility of <i>trypanosoma congolense</i> and <i>trypanosoma brucei</i> strains
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
254 views DOI Abstract
2017
wildlife-livestock interactions and risk areas for cross-species spread of bovine tuberculosis
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
218 views DOI Abstract
2017
geigerin-induced cytotoxicity in a murine myoblast cell line (c2c12)
Vol. 84 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e7
223 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of the infection with the nematode <i>haemonchus contortus</i> (strongylida: trichostrongylidae) on the haematological, biochemical, clinical and reproductive traits in rams
Vol. 83 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
276 views DOI Abstract
2015
prevalence of salivary gland hypertrophy syndrome in laboratory colonies and wild flies of <i>glossina pallidipes</i> in ethiopia
Vol. 82 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e6
218 views DOI Abstract
2015
the occurrence of <i>culicoides</i> species, the vectors of arboviruses, at selected trap sites in zimbabwe
Vol. 82 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e8
187 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
26.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,059 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

26.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.