Indexed in Journament

administrative science quarterly

ISSN 0001-8392· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,321 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 10.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

The ASQ logo reads, "Dedicated to advancing the understanding of administration through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis." We interpret "administration" in the broadest possible sense to include all of the processes involved in creating, coordinating, and transforming the social settings in which it occurs. ASQ seeks to advance the understanding of management, organizations, and organizing in a wide variety of contexts, including teams, business and nonprofit organizations, government agencies, and markets. Contributions to this enterprise can include the discovery and analysis of new phenomena, new theoretical accounts informed by empirical analysis, or the disconfirmation of existing theory.
简称 administrative science quarterly
缩写名称 administrative science quarterly
ISSN 0001-8392
URL https://journals.sagepub.com/home/asq
作者须知 https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/ASQ

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for administrative science quarterly
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 49.5 31.2
Community Impact 3.6 13.4
Content Distribution 70.8 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2017
conservation status, species composition, and distribution of avian community in bhimbandh wildlife sanctuary, india
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 20-26
350 views DOI Abstract
2014
new faunistic data on the family braconidae (hymenoptera) from korea
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 489-492
346 views DOI Abstract
2016
conservation implications of wildlife utilization by indigenous communities in the southern western ghats of india
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 271-279
343 views DOI Abstract
2016
2014
floristic study of cheondeungsan mountain in korea
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 308-318
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
a checklist of soldierflies (diptera, stratiomyidae) in india
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 44-54
306 views DOI Abstract
2014
microstructure of the water spider (argyroneta aquatica) using the scanning electron microscope
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 484-488
298 views DOI Abstract
2015
natural history of the trapdoor spider idiops joida gupta et al 2013 (araneae: idiopidae) from the western ghats in india
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 38-42
272 views DOI Abstract
2018
contents
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. i-ii
97 views DOI
2017
taxonomic revision of the genus aridelus marshall (hymenoptera: braconidae: euphorinae) from korea
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 409-412
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
diet composition of lesser kestrels in ikh nart nature reserve, mongolia
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 460-464
122 views Abstract
2017
three water scavenger beetle species (coleoptera: hydrophilidae) new to korea
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 39-43
253 views DOI Abstract
2017
a new species of emilia cass. (asteraceae) from the eastern ghats of india with notes on ecosystem evaluation and conservation status
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 104-111
186 views DOI Abstract
2017
why does quercus suber species decline in mediterranean areas?
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 337-341
214 views DOI Abstract
2017
new record of the genus toxares haliday (hymenoptera: braconidae: aphidiinae) from korea
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 596-598
139 views Abstract
Journament Score
28.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,321 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

49.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

3.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.