Indexed in Journament

administrative science quarterly

ISSN 0001-8392· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.5/100
Journament Score
#2,270
Journament Rank
27
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

The ASQ logo reads, "Dedicated to advancing the understanding of administration through empirical investigation and theoretical analysis." We interpret "administration" in the broadest possible sense to include all of the processes involved in creating, coordinating, and transforming the social settings in which it occurs. ASQ seeks to advance the understanding of management, organizations, and organizing in a wide variety of contexts, including teams, business and nonprofit organizations, government agencies, and markets. Contributions to this enterprise can include the discovery and analysis of new phenomena, new theoretical accounts informed by empirical analysis, or the disconfirmation of existing theory.
Short Name administrative science quarterly
Abbreviated Name administrative science quarterly
ISSN 0001-8392
URL https://journals.sagepub.com/home/asq
Author Instructions https://journals.sagepub.com/author-instructions/ASQ

Indexings

ulakbim soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2017
conservation status, species composition, and distribution of avian community in bhimbandh wildlife sanctuary, india
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 20-26
340 views DOI Abstract
2014
new faunistic data on the family braconidae (hymenoptera) from korea
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 489-492
333 views DOI Abstract
2016
conservation implications of wildlife utilization by indigenous communities in the southern western ghats of india
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 271-279
325 views DOI Abstract
2016
2014
microstructure of the water spider (argyroneta aquatica) using the scanning electron microscope
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 484-488
294 views DOI Abstract
2014
floristic study of cheondeungsan mountain in korea
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 308-318
292 views DOI Abstract
2017
a checklist of soldierflies (diptera, stratiomyidae) in india
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 44-54
291 views DOI Abstract
2015
natural history of the trapdoor spider idiops joida gupta et al 2013 (araneae: idiopidae) from the western ghats in india
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 38-42
263 views DOI Abstract
2018
contents
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. i-ii
83 views DOI
2017
taxonomic revision of the genus aridelus marshall (hymenoptera: braconidae: euphorinae) from korea
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 409-412
243 views DOI Abstract
2017
diet composition of lesser kestrels in ikh nart nature reserve, mongolia
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 460-464
113 views Abstract
2017
three water scavenger beetle species (coleoptera: hydrophilidae) new to korea
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 39-43
240 views DOI Abstract
2017
a new species of emilia cass. (asteraceae) from the eastern ghats of india with notes on ecosystem evaluation and conservation status
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 104-111
175 views DOI Abstract
2017
why does quercus suber species decline in mediterranean areas?
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 337-341
200 views DOI Abstract
2017
new record of the genus toxares haliday (hymenoptera: braconidae: aphidiinae) from korea
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 596-598
135 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
45
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.