The journal of sexual medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1347 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

The journal of sexual medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name J Sex Med
Abbreviated Name j sex med
ISSN 1743-6109
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/the-journal-of-sexual-medicine
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (29 total)

2010
Improved ejaculatory latency, control and sexual satisfaction when PSD502 is applied topically in men with premature ejaculation: results of a phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Carson, Culley;Wyllie, Michael;
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. 3179-89
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Current Legal Situation for Patients with Paraphilic disorders and Implications of the ICD-11 for Paraphilic Disorders for Germany.
Briken, Peer;Boetticher, Axel;Krueger, Richard B;Kismödi, Eszter;Reed, Geoffrey M;
376 views DOI Abstract
2016
Lifestyle Factors and Premature Ejaculation: Are Physical Exercise, Alcohol Consumption, and Body Mass Index Associated With Premature Ejaculation and Comorbid Erectile Problems?
Ventus, Daniel;Jern, Patrick;
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. 1482-7
361 views DOI Abstract
2020
genotyping of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus detected in diseased rabbits in egyptian provinces by vp60 sequencing
;Ahmed M. Erfan;Azhar G. Shalaby
Vol. 13 , No. 6 , pp. 1098-1107
343 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sexual Functioning in Men With and Without Disabilities: Findings From a Representative Sample of Australian Men.
Bollier, Anne-Marie;King, Tania;Shakespeare, Tom;Hocking, Jane;Kavanagh, Anne;
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perspectives on Priapism Education in Emergency Medicine.
Dai, Jessica C;Franzen, Douglas S;Lendvay, Thomas S;Ostrowski, Kevin A;Walsh, Thomas J;
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 159-162
319 views DOI Abstract
2014
The multiple sclerosis intimacy and sexuality questionnaire-19: reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Persian version.
Mohammadi, Khadijeh;Rahnama, Parvin;Montazeri, Ali;Foley, Frederick W;
Vol. 11 , No. 9 , pp. 2225-31
302 views DOI Abstract
2005
The other side: failure in fair and balanced reporting.
Althof, Stanley E;Goldstein, Irwin;Becher, Edgardo;Giraldi, Annamaria;Vardi, Yoram;Dennerstein, Lorraine;Marson, Lesley;Brotto, Lori;Schreiner-Engel, Patricia;Wallen, Kim;Clayton, Anita;Altman, Alan;Kingsberg, Sheryl;Shabsigh, Ridwan;, ;
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 583-4
301 views
2008
Psychometric validation of a sexual quality of life questionnaire for use in men with premature ejaculation or erectile dysfunction.
Abraham, Lucy;Symonds, Tara;Morris, Mark F;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 595-601
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
first isolation of dicrocoelium dendriticum among cattle in some northern algerian slaughterhouses
;Linda Chougar;Kh. Harhoura;M. Aissi
Vol. 12 , No. 7 , pp. 1039-1045
289 views DOI Abstract
View All 29 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.