Indexed in Journament

Public health

ISSN 1476-5616· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.1 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #3,251 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 88.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Public Health
Abbreviated Name public health
ISSN 1476-5616
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/public-health

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Public health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity 77.8 27.3
Innovation 70.0 28.9
Community Impact 10.0 9.7
Content Distribution 73.9 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2017
Factors affecting participation decision and amount of physical activity among urban dwellers in Malaysia.
Vol. 146 , pp. 84-91
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
Survival analysis and prognostic factors of time to first domestic violence after marriage among Nigeria, Kenya, and Mozambique women.
Vol. 181 , pp. 122-134
443 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the potential outcomes of achieving the World Health Organization global non-communicable diseases targets for risk factors by 2025: is there also an economic dividend?
Vol. 169 , pp. 173-179
433 views DOI Abstract
2019
Attention to food health warnings in children's advertising: a French perspective.
Vol. 173 , pp. 69-74
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
A scoping review of studies evaluating the education of health professional students about public health.
Vol. 178 , pp. 105-111
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Time-trend analysis of fruit and vegetable intake in Hong Kong, 2004-2016.
Vol. 177 , pp. 102-111
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Small area estimation of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage among school-age children in Alabama counties.
Vol. 177 , pp. 120-127
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Severe maternal morbidity among women with a history of cesarean section at a tertiary referral teaching hospital in the southeast of Iran.
Vol. 175 , pp. 101-107
402 views DOI Abstract
2021
Risk and protective behaviors for chronic non-communicable diseases among Brazilian adults
Vol. 195 , pp. -
196 views Abstract
2020
Evaluation of practice to promote physical activity in schools in a unitary authority in England.
Vol. 182 , pp. 155-160
167 views DOI Abstract
2020
The growth of sports betting in Malawi: corporate strategies, public space and public health.
Vol. 184 , pp. 95-101
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
2020
The end of 'cordon sanitaire' in Wuhan: the role of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19.
Vol. 185 , pp. 6-7
334 views DOI
2020
COVID19: The need for public health in a time of emergency
Vol. 182 , pp. 188-189
152 views DOI
Journament Score
42.1/100 · Below Average
Ranked #3,251 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

42.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

77.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.