complementary therapies in clinical practice | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1698 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

complementary therapies in clinical practice

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name complement ther clin pract
Abbreviated Name complement ther clin pract
ISSN 1873-6947
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/complementary-therapies-in-clinical-practice
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2018
Management of psoriasis with nutraceuticals: An update.
Raut, Gauravi;Wairkar, Sarika;
Vol. 31 , pp. 25-30
392 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of laughter yoga on salivary cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone among healthy university students: A randomized controlled trial.
Fujisawa, Akiko;Ota, Atsuhiko;Matsunaga, Masaaki;Li, Yuanying;Kakizaki, Masako;Naito, Hisao;Yatsuya, Hiroshi;
Vol. 32 , pp. 6-11
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
A pilot feasibility study of mindfulness childbirth education for women with a history of sexual trauma.
Price, Cynthia;Kantrowitz-Gordon, Ira;Calhoun, Rebecca;
Vol. 37 , pp. 102-108
341 views DOI Abstract
2005
Petit bourgeois health care? The big small-business of private complementary medical practice.
Andrews, Gavin J;Phillips, David R;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 87-104
329 views Abstract
2019
Comparing the effects of auricular seed acupressure and foot reflexology on neonatal abstinence syndrome: A modified double blind clinical trial.
Sajadi, Shimaalsadat;Kazemi, Majid;Bakhtar, Babak;Ostadebrahimi, Hamid;
Vol. 36 , pp. 72-76
298 views DOI Abstract
2018
Herbal medicine use among hypertensive patients attending public and private health facilities in Freetown Sierra Leone.
James, Peter Bai;Kamara, Halimatu;Bah, Abdulai Jawo;Steel, Amie;Wardle, Jon;
Vol. 31 , pp. 7-15
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of royal jelly on menopausal symptoms: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Sharif, Seyedeh Nazanin;Darsareh, Fatemeh;
Vol. 37 , pp. 47-50
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stress Management and Resiliency Training for public school teachers and staff: A novel intervention to enhance resilience and positively impact student interactions.
Chesak, Sherry S;Khalsa, Tejinder K;Bhagra, Anjali;Jenkins, Sarah M;Bauer, Brent A;Sood, Amit;
Vol. 37 , pp. 32-38
280 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of a yoga nidra on the life stress and self-esteem in university students
Dol, K.
Vol. 35 , pp. 232-236
257 views DOI
2020
The effect of yoga on the quality of life and fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Shohani, M.
Vol. 39 , pp. 0-0
245 views DOI
View All 12 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.