revista de la asociacion espanola de especialistas en medicina del trabajo | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4870 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

revista de la asociacion espanola de especialistas en medicina del trabajo

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name revista de la asociacion espanola de especialistas en medicina del trabajo
Abbreviated Name revista de la asociacion espanola de especialistas en medicina del trabajo
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
biνo phenomenology at the lhc
;Julia Gehrlein;Seyda Ipek;Patrick J. Fox
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. 1-18
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
search for light mediators in the low-energy data of the connie reactor neutrino experiment
;The CONNIE collaboration;Alexis Aguilar-Arevalo;Xavier Bertou;Carla Bonifazi;Gustavo Cancelo;Brenda Aurea Cervantes-Vergara;Claudio Chavez;Juan C. D’Olivo;João C. dos Anjos;Juan Estrada;Aldo R. Fernandes Neto;Guillermo Fernandez-Moroni;Ana Foguel;Richard Ford;Federico Izraelevitch;Ben Kilminster;H. P. Lima;Martin Makler;Jorge Molina;Philipe Mota;Irina Nasteva;Eduardo Paolini;Carlos Romero;Youssef Sarkis;Miguel Sofo Haro;Javier Tiffenberg;Christian Torres
Vol. 2020 , No. 4 , pp. 1-17
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
continuing search for new physics in b → sμμ decays: two operators at a time
;Ashutosh Kumar Alok;Amol Dighe;Shireen Gangal;Dinesh Kumar
Vol. 2019 , No. 6 , pp. 1-16
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
twisting and localization in supergravity: equivariant cohomology of bps black holes
;Imtak Jeon;Sameer Murthy
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. 1-53
284 views DOI Abstract
2018
Psychosocial factors and coping strategies associated to stress in universitary professors
del, Carmen R.
Vol. 27 , pp. 197-203
275 views
2019
feasibility of τ -lepton electromagnetic dipole moments measurement using bent crystal at the lhc
;A. S. Fomin;A. Yu. Korchin;A. Stocchi;S. Barsuk;P. Robbe
Vol. 2019 , No. 3 , pp. 1-23
236 views DOI Abstract
2019
on structure constants with two spinning twist-two operators
;Marco S. Bianchi
Vol. 2019 , No. 4 , pp. 1-17
223 views DOI Abstract
2019
exact summation of leading infrared logarithms in 2d effective field theories
;Jonas Linzen;Maxim V. Polyakov;Kirill M. Semenov-Tian-Shansky;Nika S. Sokolova
Vol. 2019 , No. 4 , pp. 1-23
219 views DOI Abstract
2019
reducible contributions to quantum electrodynamics in external fields
;Naser Ahmadiniaz;James P. Edwards;Anton Ilderton
Vol. 2019 , No. 5 , pp. 1-35
198 views DOI Abstract
2020
first search for the η c2(1d) in b decays at belle
;The Belle collaboration;K. Chilikin;I. Adachi;H. Aihara;S. Al Said;D. M. Asner;V. Aulchenko;T. Aushev;R. Ayad;V. Babu;S. Bahinipati;P. Behera;C. Beleño;K. Belous;J. Bennett;V. Bhardwaj;T. Bilka;J. Biswal;G. Bonvicini;A. Bozek;M. Bračko;T. E. Browder;M. Campajola;L. Cao;D. Červenkov;M.-C. Chang;V. Chekelian;A. Chen;B. G. Cheon;K. Cho;S.-K. Choi;Y. Choi;S. Choudhury;D. Cinabro;S. Cunliffe;N. Dash;G. De Nardo;F. Di Capua;Z. Doležal;T. V. Dong;S. Eidelman;D. Epifanov;J. E. Fast;T. Ferber;D. Ferlewicz;B. G. Fulsom;R. Garg;V. Gaur;N. Gabyshev;A. Garmash;A. Giri;P. Goldenzweig;B. Golob;O. Grzymkowska;O. Hartbrich;K. Hayasaka;H. Hayashii;M. Hernandez Villanueva;W.-S. Hou;C.-L. Hsu;K. Inami;G. Inguglia;A. Ishikawa;R. Itoh;M. Iwasaki;Y. Iwasaki;W. W. Jacobs;E.-J. Jang;S. Jia;Y. Jin;K. K. Joo;A. B. Kaliyar;G. Karyan;Y. Kato;T. Kawasaki;C. Kiesling;C. H. Kim;D. Y. Kim;K.-H. Kim;S. H. Kim;Y.-K. Kim;T. D. Kimmel;K. Kinoshita;P. Kodyš;S. Korpar;P. Križan;R. Kroeger;P. Krokovny;T. Kuhr;R. Kulasiri;R. Kumar;A. Kuzmin;Y.-J. Kwon;K. Lalwani;J. S. Lange;I. S. Lee;S. C. Lee;L. K. Li;Y. B. Li;L. Li Gioi;J. Libby;K. Lieret;D. Liventsev;C. MacQueen;M. Masuda;T. Matsuda;D. Matvienko;M. Merola;K. Miyabayashi;R. Mizuk;G. B. Mohanty;T. J. Moon;T. Mori;M. Mrvar;R. Mussa;M. Nakao;Z. Natkaniec;M. Nayak;N. K. Nisar;S. Nishida;K. Nishimura;K. Ogawa;S. Ogawa;H. Ono;Y. Onuki;P. Oskin;P. Pakhlov;G. Pakhlova;S. Pardi;H. Park;S.-H. Park;S. Patra;S. Paul;T. K. Pedlar;R. Pestotnik;L. E. Piilonen;T. Podobnik;V. Popov;E. Prencipe;M. T. Prim;M. Ritter;M. Röhrken;A. Rostomyan;N. Rout;G. Russo;Y. Sakai;A. Sangal;L. Santelj;T. Sanuki;V. Savinov;G. Schnell;J. Schueler;C. Schwanda;Y. Seino;K. Senyo;M. Shapkin;J.-G. Shiu;B. Shwartz;A. Sokolov;E. Solovieva;M. Starič;Z. S. Stottler;K. Sumisawa;T. Sumiyoshi;W. Sutcliffe;M. Takizawa;K. Tanida;F. Tenchini;K. Trabelsi;M. Uchida;S. Uehara;T. Uglov;Y. Unno;S. Uno;P. Urquijo;Y. Usov;G. Varner;A. Vinokurova;V. Vorobyev;C. H. Wang;E. Wang;M.-Z. Wang;P. Wang;M. Watanabe;S. Watanuki;E. Won;X. Xu;W. Yan;S. B. Yang;H. Ye;J. H. Yin;C. Z. Yuan;J. Zhang;Z. P. Zhang;V. Zhilich;V. Zhukova;V. Zhulanov
Vol. 2020 , No. 5 , pp. 1-26
176 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.