journal of applied psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#341 / 33,826
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 19 hours ago

journal of applied psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name journal of applied psychology
Abbreviated Name journal of applied psychology
ISSN 0021-9010
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2017
impact of additional cholecalciferol supplementation on the level of thyroid peroxidase antibodies in patients with primary hypothyroidism
;I.V. Pankiv
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 116-119
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace
Ganegoda D.
Vol. 104 , pp. 776-795
300 views DOI
2017
Catching fire and spreading it: A glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns
Li, J.
Vol. 102 , pp. 1075-1090
294 views DOI
2017
Сaudal epidural blocks in the treatment of pain syndromes of the lumbosacral spine in degenerative-dystrophic diseases
;I.V. Roy;Ya.V. Fishchenko;A.R. Garmish;B.B. Pavlov;I.I. Bila;A.P. Kudrin
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 21-26
291 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative analysis of the effectiveness of chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid and arthroscopy at the initial stages of hip osteoarthritis
;V.G. Lutsyshyn;A.V. Kalashnikov;O.V. Maiko;V.M. Maiko
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 139-145
252 views DOI Abstract
2017
conservative treatment of bone tissue metabolic disorders among patients with vitamin d-dependent rickets type ii with genetic abnormality of type i collagen formation
;S.M. Martsyniak
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 120-126
244 views DOI Abstract
2016
When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations
Wellman, N.
Vol. 101 , pp. 793-814
236 views DOI
2001
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M.
Vol. 86 , pp. 114-121
232 views DOI
2019
Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers
Campion, M.
Vol. 104 , pp. 1089-1102
200 views DOI
2017
rehabilitation activities in patients at the early stages of coxarthrosis after arthroscopy of the hip joint
;I.V. Roy;V.G. Lutsishin;A.V. Kalashnikov;A.I. Bayandina;V.M. Maiko;A.V. Maiko
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 172-178
193 views DOI Abstract
View All 30 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.