Indexed in Journament

journal of applied psychology

ISSN 0021-9010· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
22.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #28,161 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 3.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of applied psychology
Abbreviated Name journal of applied psychology
ISSN 0021-9010
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/apl/index.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 37.0 25.8
Innovation 42.0 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 18.3 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2001
The job demands-resources model of burnout.
Evangelia Demerouti; Arnold B. Bakker; Friedhelm Nachreiner; Wilmar B. Schaufeli
11,664 views DOI
2017
impact of additional cholecalciferol supplementation on the level of thyroid peroxidase antibodies in patients with primary hypothyroidism
;I.V. Pankiv
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 116-119
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace
Ganegoda D.
Vol. 104 , pp. 776-795
386 views DOI
2017
Catching fire and spreading it: A glimpse into displayed entrepreneurial passion in crowdfunding campaigns
Li, J.
Vol. 102 , pp. 1075-1090
355 views DOI
2017
Сaudal epidural blocks in the treatment of pain syndromes of the lumbosacral spine in degenerative-dystrophic diseases
;I.V. Roy;Ya.V. Fishchenko;A.R. Garmish;B.B. Pavlov;I.I. Bila;A.P. Kudrin
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 21-26
353 views DOI Abstract
2017
conservative treatment of bone tissue metabolic disorders among patients with vitamin d-dependent rickets type ii with genetic abnormality of type i collagen formation
;S.M. Martsyniak
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 120-126
342 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative analysis of the effectiveness of chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid and arthroscopy at the initial stages of hip osteoarthritis
;V.G. Lutsyshyn;A.V. Kalashnikov;O.V. Maiko;V.M. Maiko
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 139-145
322 views DOI Abstract
2016
When are do-gooders treated badly? Legitimate power, role expectations, and reactions to moral objection in organizations
Wellman, N.
Vol. 101 , pp. 793-814
300 views DOI
2001
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
Lindell, M.
Vol. 86 , pp. 114-121
297 views DOI
2019
Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers
Campion, M.
Vol. 104 , pp. 1089-1102
283 views DOI
2020
A Motivational Lens Model of Person × Situation Interactions in Employee Creativity
van, Knippenberg D.
, pp. 0-0
147 views DOI
2019
It Hurts Me Too! (or Not?): Exploring the Negative Implications for Abusive Bosses
Priesemuth, M.
, pp. 0-0
110 views DOI
2019
Using practice employment tests to improve recruitment and personnel selection outcomes for organizations and job seekers
Campion, M.
Vol. 104 , pp. 1089-1102
283 views DOI
2019
Toward a dimensional model of vocational interests
Su, R.
Vol. 104 , pp. 690-714
221 views DOI
2019
Gender and the evaluation of humor at work
Evans, J.
Vol. 104 , pp. 1077-1087
198 views DOI
2019
I can be happy for you, but not all the time: A contingency model of envy and positive empathy in the workplace
Ganegoda D.
Vol. 104 , pp. 776-795
386 views DOI
2017
comparative analysis of the effectiveness of chondroitin sulfate, hyaluronic acid and arthroscopy at the initial stages of hip osteoarthritis
;V.G. Lutsyshyn;A.V. Kalashnikov;O.V. Maiko;V.M. Maiko
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 139-145
322 views DOI Abstract
2017
conservative treatment of bone tissue metabolic disorders among patients with vitamin d-dependent rickets type ii with genetic abnormality of type i collagen formation
;S.M. Martsyniak
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 120-126
342 views DOI Abstract
2017
angiopathy in ankylosing spondylitis
;Ie.D. Iegudina;O.V. Syniachenko;O.E. Chernyshova;T.R. Polesova;M.V. Ermolaeva
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 27-31
241 views DOI Abstract
2017
ukrainian frax version: development and implementation into clinical practice
;N. Kuprinenko
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 37-40
105 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
22.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #28,161 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

22.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

42.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

18.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.