revista de economia mundial | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3151 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

revista de economia mundial

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name revista de economia mundial
Abbreviated Name revista de economia mundial
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2008
smoking-induced gene expression changes in the bronchial airway are reflected in nasal and buccal epithelium
;Zhang Xiaohui;Dumas Yves-Martine;Liu Gang;Steiling Katrina;Gustafson Adam M;Shah Vishal;Zeskind Julie;Schembri Frank;Sridhar Sriram;Brody Jerome S;Lenburg Marc E;Spira Avrum
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 259-
406 views DOI Abstract
2006
converting a breast cancer microarray signature into a high-throughput diagnostic test
;Warmoes Marc O;Bruinsma Tako J;Lahti-Domenici Jaana ST;Bakx Niels;Pover Rob CF;Witteveen Anke T;Delahaye Leonie JMJ;Floore Arno;Glas Annuska M;Bernards René;Wessels Lodewyk FA;Van 't Veer Laura J
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 278-
394 views DOI Abstract
2010
mobile element scanning (me-scan) by targeted high-throughput sequencing
;Watkins W Scott;Zhang Yuhua;Xing Jinchuan;Witherspoon David J;Batzer Mark A;Jorde Lynn B
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 410-
382 views DOI Abstract
2012
pair-barcode high-throughput sequencing for large-scale multiplexed sample analysis
;Tu Jing;Ge Qinyu;Wang Shengqin;Wang Lei;Sun Beili;Yang Qi;Bai Yunfei;Lu Zuhong
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 43-
364 views DOI Abstract
2010
aryl hydrocarbon receptor (ahr)-regulated transcriptomic changes in rats sensitive or resistant to major dioxin toxicities
;Okey Allan B;Chen Hanbo;Boutros Paul C;Moffat Ivy D;Pohjanvirta Raimo
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 263-
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
genome-wide identification, phylogenetic and expression analysis of the heat shock transcription factor family in bread wheat (triticum aestivum l.)
;Min Zhou;Shigang Zheng;Rong Liu;Jing Lu;Lu Lu;Chihong Zhang;Zehou Liu;Congpei Luo;Lei Zhang;Levi Yant;Yu Wu
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-18
347 views DOI Abstract
2020
complete chloroplast genome sequence of barleria prionitis, comparative chloroplast genomics and phylogenetic relationships among acanthoideae
;Dhafer A. Alzahrani;Samaila S. Yaradua;Enas J. Albokhari;Abidina Abba
Vol. 21 , No. 1 , pp. 1-19
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
long-read based assembly and synteny analysis of a reference drosophila subobscura genome reveals signatures of structural evolution driven by inversions recombination-suppression effects
;Charikleia Karageorgiou;Víctor Gámez-Visairas;Rosa Tarrío;Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 1-21
335 views DOI Abstract
2004
posa: perl objects for dna sequencing data analysis
;Jungerius Bart J;Aerts Jan A;Groenen Martien AM
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 60-
329 views DOI Abstract
2010
positional differences in the wound transcriptome of skin and oral mucosa
;Chen Lin;Arbieva Zarema H;Guo Shujuan;Marucha Phillip T;Mustoe Thomas A;DiPietro Luisa A
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 471-
324 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.