American journal of men's health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6083 / 33,980
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

American journal of men's health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name Am J Mens Health
Abbreviated Name american journal of men's health
ISSN 1557-9891
Aim and Scope
URL http://jmh.sagepub.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2012
evaluation of the 'healthy start to pregnancy' early antenatal health promotion workshop: a randomized controlled trial
;Wilkinson Shelley A;McIntyre H
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 131-
504 views DOI Abstract
2017
multidisciplinary consensus on screening for, diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction in the netherlands
;Viki Verfaille;Ank de Jonge;Lidwine Mokkink;Myrte Westerneng;Henriëtte van der Horst;Petra Jellema;Arie Franx;IRIS study group
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
435 views DOI Abstract
Men's Work-Related Stress and Mental Health: Illustrating the Workings of Masculine Role Norms.
Boettcher, Nick;Mitchell, Jennifer;Lashewicz, Bonnie;Jones, Erin;Wang, JianLi;Gundu, Sarika;Marchand, Alain;Michalak, Erin;Lam, Ray;
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 1557988319838416
423 views DOI Abstract
2010
the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese
;Willson Kristyn J;Rumbold Alice R;Athukorala Chaturica;Crowther Caroline A
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 56-
418 views DOI Abstract
2017
Acceptability of the POWERPLAY Program: A Workplace Health Promotion Intervention for Men
Seaton, Cherisse L.;Bottorff, Joan L.;Oliffe, John L.;Jones-Bricker, Margaret;Caperchione, Cristina M.;Johnson, Steven T.;Sharp, Paul;
Vol. 11 , pp. -
361 views Abstract
2019
factors influencing the use of supervised delivery services in garu-tempane district, ghana
;John Kuumuori Ganle;Mathew Loyarl Kombet;Leonard Baatiema
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cognitive, Regulatory, and Interpersonal Mechanisms of HIV Stigma on the Mental and Social Health of Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV.
Chan, Randolph C H;Mak, Winnie W S;
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 1557988319873778
336 views DOI Abstract
2018
Association Between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Severe Male Reproductive Organ Impairment (Germinal Epithelial Loss): Study on a Mouse Model and on Human Patients
PhD, Uriel A. López-Lemus;PhD, Raquel Garza-Guajardo;PhD, Oralia Barboza-Quintana;PhD, Alejandrina Rodríguez-Hernandez;García-Rivera, Alejandro;Madrigal-Pérez, Violeta M.;PhD, José Guzmán-Esquivel;PhD, Laura E. García-Labastida;PhD, Alejandro D. Soriano-Hernández;Martínez-Fierro, Margarita L.;PhD, Iram P. Rodríguez-Sánchez;PhD, Elizabeth Sánchez-Duarte;PhD, Ariana Cabrera-Licona;PhD, Gabriel Ceja-Espiritu;PhD, Iván Delgado-Enciso;
Vol. 12 , pp. -
314 views Abstract
The Relationship Between Electronic Gaming and Health, Social Relationships, and Physical Activity Among Males in Saudi Arabia.
Alshehri, Abdullah Ghurm;Mohamed, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Salam;
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 1557988319873512
314 views DOI Abstract
2016
Gender-Atypical Mental Illness as Male Gender Threat.
Michniewicz, Kenneth S;Bosson, Jennifer K;Lenes, Joshua G;Chen, Jason I;
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 306-17
313 views DOI Abstract
View All 21 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.