Indexed in Journament

American journal of men's health

ISSN 1557-9891· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,850 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 49.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Am J Mens Health
Abbreviated Name american journal of men's health
ISSN 1557-9891
URL http://jmh.sagepub.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for American journal of men's health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 20.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.2
Content Distribution 62.4 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2012
evaluation of the 'healthy start to pregnancy' early antenatal health promotion workshop: a randomized controlled trial
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 131-
553 views DOI Abstract
2017
multidisciplinary consensus on screening for, diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction in the netherlands
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 1-17
472 views DOI Abstract
Men's Work-Related Stress and Mental Health: Illustrating the Workings of Masculine Role Norms.
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 1557988319838416
464 views DOI Abstract
2010
the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 56-
442 views DOI Abstract
2017
Acceptability of the POWERPLAY Program: A Workplace Health Promotion Intervention for Men
Vol. 11 , pp. -
410 views Abstract
2019
factors influencing the use of supervised delivery services in garu-tempane district, ghana
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cognitive, Regulatory, and Interpersonal Mechanisms of HIV Stigma on the Mental and Social Health of Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 1557988319873778
373 views DOI Abstract
The Relationship Between Electronic Gaming and Health, Social Relationships, and Physical Activity Among Males in Saudi Arabia.
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 1557988319873512
348 views DOI Abstract
2018
Association Between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Severe Male Reproductive Organ Impairment (Germinal Epithelial Loss): Study on a Mouse Model and on Human Patients
Vol. 12 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2016
Gender-Atypical Mental Illness as Male Gender Threat.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 306-17
334 views DOI Abstract
2024
Support for the Supporter: Paternal Postpartum Loneliness and Social Support During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Vol. 18 , pp. 15579883241249921
82 views DOI Abstract
2024
Patterns and Factors Associated With Alcohol Misuse Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men in New York City.
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 15579883231218580
116 views DOI Abstract
2023
Humor-Based Messaging in Testicular Cancer Awareness Campaigns: A Comparative Critical Review.
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 15579883231215343
138 views DOI Abstract
2019
factors influencing the use of supervised delivery services in garu-tempane district, ghana
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-11
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
2019
serological screening of immunoglobulin m and immunoglobulin g during pregnancy for predicting congenital cytomegalovirus infection
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
255 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cognitive, Regulatory, and Interpersonal Mechanisms of HIV Stigma on the Mental and Social Health of Men Who Have Sex With Men Living With HIV.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 1557988319873778
373 views DOI Abstract
2018
Reflections of Men of Mexican Origin: A Grounded Theory Study of Intimate Partner Violence Risk Factors.
Vol. 12 , No. 5 , pp. 1784-1798
328 views DOI Abstract
2018
Association Between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Severe Male Reproductive Organ Impairment (Germinal Epithelial Loss): Study on a Mouse Model and on Human Patients
Vol. 12 , pp. -
336 views Abstract
2017
Impact of Tailored Interventions to Reduce Drug Use and Sexual Risk Behaviors Among Homeless Gay and Bisexual Men
Vol. 11 , pp. -
109 views Abstract
Journament Score
31.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,850 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.