Indexed in Journament

journal of business ethics

ISSN 0167-4544· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #9,988 of 29,177 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 65.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of business ethics
Abbreviated Name journal of business ethics
ISSN 0167-4544
URL http://www.springer.com/10551

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.1 30.1
Accessibility 35.0 18.5
Timeliness 50.0 22.4
Diversity 30.0 29.3
Innovation 40.0 32.0
Community Impact 32.5 15.2
Content Distribution 64.4 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2019
Accountability in an Independent Regulatory Setting: The Use of Impact Assessment in the Regulation of Financial Reporting in the UK
Samsonova-Taddei, A.
Vol. 155 , pp. 1053-1076
605 views DOI
2019
The Relationship Between Responsible Leadership and Organisational Commitment and the Mediating Effect of Employee Turnover Intentions: An Empirical Study with Australian Employees
Haque, A.
Vol. 156 , pp. 759-774
333 views DOI
2019
When Core Self-Evaluations Influence Employees’ Deviant Reactions to Abusive Supervision: The Moderating Role of Cognitive Ability
Kluemper, D.
Vol. 159 , pp. 435-453
323 views DOI
2019
The Role of CSR in Crises: Integration of Situational Crisis Communication Theory and the Persuasion Knowledge Model
Ham, C.
Vol. 158 , pp. 353-372
316 views DOI
2019
Exploring the Relationship Between Exclusive Talent Management, Perceived Organizational Justice and Employee Engagement: Bridging the Literature
O’Connor, E.
Vol. 156 , pp. 903-917
306 views DOI
1992
Employee attitudes toward whistleblowing: Management and public policy implications
Callahan, E.
Vol. 11 , pp. 939-948
279 views DOI
2019
Just the Servant: An Intersectional Critique of Servant Leadership
Liu, H.
Vol. 156 , pp. 1099-1112
278 views DOI
2019
Empowering Women: The Role of Emancipative Forces in Board Gender Diversity
Brieger, S.
Vol. 155 , pp. 495-511
270 views DOI
2019
Human Dignity-Centered Business Ethics: A Conceptual Framework for Business Leaders
Mea, W.
Vol. 160 , pp. 53-69
266 views DOI
2018
No Body to Kick, No Soul to Damn: Responsibility and Accountability for the Financial Crisis (2007–2010)
Nicol, O.
Vol. 151 , pp. 101-114
260 views DOI
2020
Family Responsibility Discrimination, Power Distance, and Emotional Exhaustion: When and Why are There Gender Differences in Work–Life Conflict?
Trzebiatowski, T.
Vol. 162 , pp. 15-29
194 views DOI
2020
Afrocentric Attitudinal Reciprocity and Social Expectations of Employees: The Role of Employee-Centred CSR in Africa
Aju, O.
Vol. 161 , pp. 763-781
171 views DOI
2020
Measuring Social Performance in Social Enterprises: A Global Study of Microfinance Institutions
Beisland, L.
, pp. 0-0
241 views DOI
2020
The Transformation from Traditional Nonprofit Organizations to Social Enterprises: An Institutional Entrepreneurship Perspective
Ko, W.
, pp. 0-0
146 views DOI
2020
Deepening Methods in Business Ethics
Freeman, R.
Vol. 161 , pp. 0-0
19 views DOI
2020
Dissensus! Radical Democracy and Business Ethics
Rhodes, C.
, pp. 0-0
97 views DOI
2020
Correction to: Analyzing Leadership Attributes in Faith-Based Organizations: Idealism Versus Reality (Journal of Business Ethics, (2019), 10.1007/s10551-019-04358-7)
Zigan, K.
, pp. 0-0
149 views DOI
2019
Convergence in International Business Ethics? A Comparative Study of Ethical Philosophies, Thinking Style, and Ethical Decision-Making Between US and Korean Managers
Paik, Y.
Vol. 156 , pp. 839-855
181 views DOI
2019
The Implicit Morality of the Market and Joseph Heath’s Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics
Cohen, M.
Vol. 159 , pp. 75-88
171 views DOI
2019
Towards an Appreciation of Ethics in Social Enterprise Business Models
Bull, M.
Vol. 159 , pp. 619-634
163 views DOI
Journament Score
39.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #9,988 of 29,177 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

64.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.