Indexed in Journament

ieee journal of biomedical and health informatics

ISSN 2168-2208· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.3/100
Journament Score
#3,476
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ieee j biomed health inform
Abbreviated Name ieee j biomed health inform
ISSN 2168-2208
URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=6221020

Indexings

ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
Design and usability assessment of a multi-device SOA-based telecare framework for the elderly.
528 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coarse-to-Fine Adversarial Networks and Zone-based Uncertainty Analysis for NK/T-cell Lymphoma Segmentation in CT/PET images.
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hierarchical Class Incremental Learning of Anatomical Structures in Fetal Echocardiography Videos.
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 1046-1058
444 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decentralized Authentication of Distributed Patients in Hospital Networks using Blockchain.
402 views DOI Abstract
2016
Automatic Stress Detection in Working Environments From Smartphones' Accelerometer Data: A First Step
Vol. 20 , No. 4 , pp. -
395 views Abstract
2020
A Deep Neural Network Application for Improved Prediction of HbA1c in Type 1 Diabetes.
394 views DOI Abstract
2020
Motor Imagery Classification via Temporal Attention Cues of Graph Embedded EEG Signals.
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
An Adversarial Learning Approach to Medical Image Synthesis for Lesion Detection.
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Two-Stage Model to Predict Surgical Patients' Lengths of Stay From an Electronic Patient Database.
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 848-856
331 views DOI Abstract
2020
A pseudonymisation protocol with implicit and explicit consent routes for health records in federated ledgers.
Vol. PP
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hierarchical Class Incremental Learning of Anatomical Structures in Fetal Echocardiography Videos.
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 1046-1058
444 views DOI Abstract
2020
Coarse-to-Fine Adversarial Networks and Zone-based Uncertainty Analysis for NK/T-cell Lymphoma Segmentation in CT/PET images.
450 views DOI Abstract
2020
Motor Imagery Classification via Temporal Attention Cues of Graph Embedded EEG Signals.
345 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decentralized Authentication of Distributed Patients in Hospital Networks using Blockchain.
402 views DOI Abstract
2020
A Deep Neural Network Application for Improved Prediction of HbA1c in Type 1 Diabetes.
394 views DOI Abstract
2020
An Adversarial Learning Approach to Medical Image Synthesis for Lesion Detection.
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
Constrained Tensor Decomposition for Longitudinal Analysis of Diffusion Imaging Data.
258 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Two-Stage Model to Predict Surgical Patients' Lengths of Stay From an Electronic Patient Database.
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 848-856
331 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.