biopsychosocial medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#285 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated vor 1 Woche

biopsychosocial medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexierungen
ncbi
Kurzname biopsychosoc med
Abgekürzter Name biopsychosoc med
ISSN 1751-0759
Ziel und Umfang
URL
Autorenhinweise

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2019
The relationship between dietary inflammatory index and psychosomatic complaints profiles: results from SEPAHAN cross-sectional study.
Haghighatdoost, Fahimeh;Feizi, Awat;Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad;Feinle-Bisset, Christine;Hassanzadeh Keshteli, Ammar;Roohafza, Hamidreza;Afshar, Hamid;Adibi, Peyman;
Vol. 13 , pp. 27
354 views DOI Abstract
2017
conserved molecular mechanism of tyra dehydrogenase substrate specificity underlying alternative tyrosine biosynthetic pathways in plants and microbes
;Craig A. Schenck;Yusen Men;Hiroshi A. Maeda
Vol. 4 , pp. -
352 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exaggerated envy and guilt measured by economic games in Japanese women with anorexia nervosa.
Isobe, Masanori;Kawabata, Michiko;Murao, Ema;Noda, Tomomi;Matsukawa, Noriko;Kawada, Ryosaku;Uwatoko, Teruhisa;Murai, Toshiya;Noma, Shun'ichi;Takahashi, Hidehiko;
Vol. 12 , pp. 19
331 views DOI Abstract
2015
molecular diagnostics of neurodegenerative disorders
;Megha eAgrawal;Abhijit eBiswas
Vol. 2 , pp. -
315 views DOI Abstract
2014
nanoparticle-facilitated functional and molecular imaging for the early detection of cancer
;Maharajan eSivasubramanian;Yu eHsia;Leu-Wei eLo
Vol. 1 , pp. -
280 views DOI Abstract
2015
the role of molecular chaperones in clathrin mediated vesicular trafficking
;Rui eSousa;Eileen M Lafer
Vol. 2 , pp. -
264 views DOI Abstract
2018
free energy, enthalpy and entropy from implicit solvent end-point simulations
;Federico Fogolari;Federico Fogolari;Alessandra Corazza;Alessandra Corazza;Gennaro Esposito;Gennaro Esposito;Gennaro Esposito
Vol. 5 , pp. -
256 views DOI Abstract
2016
computational modeling of lipid metabolism in yeast
;Vera Schützhold;Jens Hahn;Katja Tummler;Edda Klipp
Vol. 3 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2018
focus on the role of d-serine and d-amino acid oxidase in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease (als)
;Nazanin R. Kondori;Nazanin R. Kondori;Praveen Paul;Jacqueline P. Robbins;Ke Liu;John C. W. Hildyard;Dominic J. Wells;Jacqueline S. de Belleroche
Vol. 5 , pp. -
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
the mutational landscape of the oncogenic mzf1 scan domain in cancer
;Mads Nygaard;Thilde Terkelsen;Andre Vidas Olsen;Valentina Sora;Juan Salamanca Viloria;Fabio Rizza;Sanne Bergstrand;Miriam Di Marco;Mette Vistesen;Matteo Tiberti;Matteo Lambrughi;Marja Jaattela;Tuula Kallunki;Elena Papaleo
Vol. 3 , pp. -
250 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.